11-30-2021, 08:04 PM
(11-30-2021, 07:40 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(11-30-2021, 12:43 PM)teejers1 Wrote:(11-30-2021, 08:15 AM)BostonCard Wrote:(11-30-2021, 07:06 AM)winflop Wrote:(11-29-2021, 09:10 PM)BobK Wrote: Just mentioning failures at Stanford.
Beware of what you wish for. It doesn’t always work out
If the current guy either can't see the problems AND implement solutions or (just as bad) can see them and WON'T implement, then I'd rather someone else at least tries even if the results are worse. Maintaining status quo after the last four seasons is not OK
I know times are tough, but we were 9-4 in 2018. We were also 4-2 in 2020, despite having to play on the road endlessly (and one wonders where we would have been had Mills not been a weird COVID testing situation). We were dreadful in 2019 and again this year, so maybe it feels like it has been forever since we had a winning season.
BC
Despite 4-2 record, Stanford was also dreadful in 2020, per Sagarin.
Sagrarin was pointless because the PAC-12 was a closed system it’s no OOC games, COVID messed with everything, and sagarin doesn’t account for playing the last four games on the road, without a chance to go home, or for Mills being out with a questionable COVID test result.
BC
Careful BC, blaming Stanford's poor Sagarin ratings last year on the draconian measures taken in Santa Clara County and not elsewhere, "playing the last four games on the road, without a chance to go home, or for Mills being out with a questionable COVID test result", might just get you in trouble with the anti-political monitors. . . .
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
