[2006alum]

So, we've got "too political" police AND "not nice enough" police?
On a board where political discussion and poster interaction is incredibly mild.  
Wow.

Just following the rules you agreed to abide by when you joined this site:

The Cardboard is designed to be a fun, amicable place for discussion of all Stanford sports. Here are some guidelines to help keep it that way. . . .

2. Attack ideas, not people. It's rare, but those who are repeatedly confrontational have been banned. If the moderators cannot determine the instigator, both parties will be banned.

---

Maybe UConn is rhe biggest threat. They are looking scary good against NC St right now, in 2nd qtr

That's been my view since before the tournament started.

I honestly think by late March they will be better than anyone but Stanford and SCAR, and honestly, even then it'd be pretty close. I totally understand how the committee prioritizes body of work and that it's hard to fully account for injuries to player, but the way Fudd, Ducharme, and Juhasz have developed, with Bueckers back, they have legitimately about the best starting five in the country. Whether they can all play as a unit when the chips are down is TBD, but I know I would like them as far away from Stanford's part of the bracket as possible. 

[2006alum]

So, we've got "too political" police AND "not nice enough" police?
On a board where political discussion and poster interaction is incredibly mild.  
Wow.

Just following the rules you agreed to abide by when you joined this site:

The Cardboard is designed to be a fun, amicable place for discussion of all Stanford sports. Here are some guidelines to help keep it that way. . . .

2. Attack ideas, not people. It's rare, but those who are repeatedly confrontational have been banned. If the moderators cannot determine the instigator, both parties will be banned.

---

Maybe UConn is rhe biggest threat. They are looking scary good against NC St right now, in 2nd qtr

That's been my view since before the tournament started.

I honestly think by late March they will be better than anyone but Stanford and SCAR, and honestly, even then it'd be pretty close. I totally understand how the committee prioritizes body of work and that it's hard to fully account for injuries to player, but the way Fudd, Ducharme, and Juhasz have developed, with Bueckers back, they have legitimately about the best starting five in the country. Whether they can all play as a unit when the chips are down is TBD, but I know I would like them as far away from Stanford's part of the bracket as possible.