11-08-2022, 01:57 PM
Huh? “Points allowed”. Aren’t lower numbers better, so Emma-Nnopu is the least valuable?
The second set of numbers needs explanation. For instance, why does it say Jump produced 2 points and gave up 7.3? I am having a problem conceiving of any objective measure coming up with those numbers.
The second set of numbers needs explanation. For instance, why does it say Jump produced 2 points and gave up 7.3? I am having a problem conceiving of any objective measure coming up with those numbers.
(11-08-2022, 01:28 PM)OCcardinal Wrote: Here's what the Analytics say:
DRtg: points allowed by a player per 100 possessions
EMMA-NNOPU,A 121.6 (13 min)
PAPADAKI,S 121.6 (5 min)
GREEN,L 121.6 (3 min)
JUMP,H 112.4 (21 min)
JONES,H 96.3 (23 min)
HARRIEL,J 91.8 (13 min)
LEPOLO,T 84.8 (21 min)
BOSGANA,E 57.1 (15 min)
NIVAR,I 47.1 (13 min)
So if defense is your priority these stats support Emma-Nnopu as a starter. But it's also her second negative net points game in a row (though she wasn't alone):
Player..Pts Prod..Pts Allw..Net Pts..Fouls Drawn
JUMP, HANNAH 2..7.3..-5.3..1
EMMA-NNOPU, AGN 0..4.9..-4.9..3
PAPADAKI, STAVI 0..1.9..-1.9..2
GREEN, LAUREN 0..1.1..-1.1..0
HARRIEL, JZANIY 5.1..3.7..1.4..3
JONES, HALEY 9.8..6.9..3..6.2
LEPOLO, TALANA 10..5.5..4.5..3
BOSGANA, ELENA 7.5..2.7..4.8..4
NIVAR, INDYA 7.5..1.9..
