[TriangleTree]

65 in the NET rankings today.

Not fully knowing the logic/algorithm of the net rankings, it seems to me that it will be almost impossible to meaningfully climb out of the hole dug by the 2 Quad 3 and Quad 4 loses.  

The logic seems to suggest:  
Loss vs Quad 1 + Win vs Quad 3/4 >>  Win vs Quad 1 + Loss vs Quad 3/4
In fact, it seems to me that multiple wins against Quad 1 cannot meaningfully make up for those losses.

I'm of course biased, but that logic seems odd to me.

[TriangleTree]

65 in the NET rankings today.

Not fully knowing the logic/algorithm of the net rankings, it seems to me that it will be almost impossible to meaningfully climb out of the hole dug by the 2 Quad 3 and Quad 4 loses.  

The logic seems to suggest:  
Loss vs Quad 1 + Win vs Quad 3/4 >>  Win vs Quad 1 + Loss vs Quad 3/4
In fact, it seems to me that multiple wins against Quad 1 cannot meaningfully make up for those losses.

I'm of course biased, but that logic seems odd to me.