09-02-2016, 09:51 PM
(09-02-2016, 09:47 PM)Mick link Wrote:Agree on all your points. Did we have eight sacks?
That's what the TV folks were saying. Weird because I thought the rush was only OK. Ertz was pretty mobile.
Kansas State Game Thread
That's what the TV folks were saying. Weird because I thought the rush was only OK. Ertz was pretty mobile.
(09-02-2016, 09:47 PM)Mick link Wrote:Agree on all your points. Did we have eight sacks?
That's what the TV folks were saying. Weird because I thought the rush was only OK. Ertz was pretty mobile.
09-02-2016, 09:52 PM
Did Harrison Philips come back in? Would hate to see him out for an extended period again
Did Harrison Philips come back in? Would hate to see him out for an extended period again
ChicagoCard
Unregistered
Unregistered
09-02-2016, 09:53 PM
(09-02-2016, 09:52 PM)Stanford_Cardinals link Wrote:Did Harrison Philips come back in? Would hate to see him out for an extended period again
No, but apparently walking with an ice wrap.
(09-02-2016, 09:52 PM)Stanford_Cardinals link Wrote:Did Harrison Philips come back in? Would hate to see him out for an extended period again
No, but apparently walking with an ice wrap.
09-02-2016, 09:57 PM
(09-02-2016, 09:53 PM)ChicagoVisitor link Wrote:[quote author=Stanford_Cardinals link=topic=15562.msg169646#msg169646 date=1472878350]
Did Harrison Philips come back in? Would hate to see him out for an extended period again
No, but apparently walking with an ice wrap.
[/quote]
Here's to a speedy recovery. One of my favorite plays of the game was watching him bat down a pass while taking on a double team.
(09-02-2016, 09:53 PM)ChicagoVisitor link Wrote:[quote author=Stanford_Cardinals link=topic=15562.msg169646#msg169646 date=1472878350]
Did Harrison Philips come back in? Would hate to see him out for an extended period again
No, but apparently walking with an ice wrap.
[/quote]
Here's to a speedy recovery. One of my favorite plays of the game was watching him bat down a pass while taking on a double team.
09-02-2016, 10:01 PM
Both Wilner and FitzGerald think Stanford was missing Bryce Love, which seems ... unlikely to me? I'd take him, obviously, but it didn't seem like the source of the problem to me.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
Both Wilner and FitzGerald think Stanford was missing Bryce Love, which seems ... unlikely to me? I'd take him, obviously, but it didn't seem like the source of the problem to me.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
ChicagoCard
Unregistered
Unregistered
09-02-2016, 10:03 PM
(09-02-2016, 09:57 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:https://twitter.com/StanfordRivals/statu...1200836608
Can we discern anything from that? Silly question I suppose. Sometimes the word is, have to wait until the MRI.
(09-02-2016, 09:57 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:https://twitter.com/StanfordRivals/statu...1200836608
Can we discern anything from that? Silly question I suppose. Sometimes the word is, have to wait until the MRI.
09-02-2016, 10:06 PM
(09-02-2016, 10:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Both Wilner and FitzGerald think Stanford was missing Bryce Love, which seems ... unlikely to me? I'd take him, obviously, but it didn't seem like the source of the problem to me.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
Eh, it could be. Why do we think this game was so bad? We punted four times? That's not all that bad, and it's easy to see Love giving us options on one of those. Scarlett seemed either bad or poorly used, and Wildcat without a sweep is just dumb. Maybe love helps one of those things.
(09-02-2016, 10:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Both Wilner and FitzGerald think Stanford was missing Bryce Love, which seems ... unlikely to me? I'd take him, obviously, but it didn't seem like the source of the problem to me.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
Eh, it could be. Why do we think this game was so bad? We punted four times? That's not all that bad, and it's easy to see Love giving us options on one of those. Scarlett seemed either bad or poorly used, and Wildcat without a sweep is just dumb. Maybe love helps one of those things.
09-02-2016, 10:15 PM
This video of Shaw's presser is not well done but -- https://www.facebook.com/stanfordfootbal...7525831301
The question about the OL is, as you'd expect, asked. Shaw seems to hint that some of the problems weren't the offensive line's fault -- perhaps the QB's?
The question about the OL is, as you'd expect, asked. Shaw seems to hint that some of the problems weren't the offensive line's fault -- perhaps the QB's?
This video of Shaw's presser is not well done but -- https://www.facebook.com/stanfordfootbal...7525831301
The question about the OL is, as you'd expect, asked. Shaw seems to hint that some of the problems weren't the offensive line's fault -- perhaps the QB's?
The question about the OL is, as you'd expect, asked. Shaw seems to hint that some of the problems weren't the offensive line's fault -- perhaps the QB's?
09-02-2016, 10:16 PM
(09-02-2016, 07:11 PM)Mick link Wrote:...
Ukropina 50 yard FG and two touchbacks, with a 75 yard kickoff.
Jake Bailey handled kickoffs, not Conrad Ukropina. His stats for 5 kickoffs were 67 yd average, 3 touchbacks. It looks as if both kickoffs and punts will be better this year than last.
Geaux Cardinal!
(09-02-2016, 07:11 PM)Mick link Wrote:...
Ukropina 50 yard FG and two touchbacks, with a 75 yard kickoff.
Jake Bailey handled kickoffs, not Conrad Ukropina. His stats for 5 kickoffs were 67 yd average, 3 touchbacks. It looks as if both kickoffs and punts will be better this year than last.
Geaux Cardinal!
09-02-2016, 10:33 PM
(09-02-2016, 10:06 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=15562.msg169652#msg169652 date=1472878863]
Both Wilner and FitzGerald think Stanford was missing Bryce Love, which seems ... unlikely to me? I'd take him, obviously, but it didn't seem like the source of the problem to me.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
Eh, it could be. Why do we think this game was so bad? We punted four times? That's not all that bad, and it's easy to see Love giving us options on one of those. Scarlett seemed either bad or poorly used, and Wildcat without a sweep is just dumb. Maybe love helps one of those things.
[/quote]
I don't think Scarlett was a problem, every time he had the ball there was a gang of defenders right in frontof him. He didn't make anything magical happen but it wasn't like he was missing open holes either a la rector on the reverse.
As mentioned above, more concerning was the o line play and not staying on blocks. C Mac had an uncanny ability to use blockers to shield himself even when that lineman didn't make a textbook block on the defender, but repeatedly tonight he was up against wide open unblocked defenders. Part of that appeared to be aggression on the part of K states safeties, which we need to punish them for. Burns looked great, made some real strikes down the middle and on tough cross field out patterns. High hopes for him.
(09-02-2016, 10:06 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=15562.msg169652#msg169652 date=1472878863]
Both Wilner and FitzGerald think Stanford was missing Bryce Love, which seems ... unlikely to me? I'd take him, obviously, but it didn't seem like the source of the problem to me.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_303...1472878445
http://www.sfchronicle.com/collegesports...er-premium
Eh, it could be. Why do we think this game was so bad? We punted four times? That's not all that bad, and it's easy to see Love giving us options on one of those. Scarlett seemed either bad or poorly used, and Wildcat without a sweep is just dumb. Maybe love helps one of those things.
[/quote]
I don't think Scarlett was a problem, every time he had the ball there was a gang of defenders right in frontof him. He didn't make anything magical happen but it wasn't like he was missing open holes either a la rector on the reverse.
As mentioned above, more concerning was the o line play and not staying on blocks. C Mac had an uncanny ability to use blockers to shield himself even when that lineman didn't make a textbook block on the defender, but repeatedly tonight he was up against wide open unblocked defenders. Part of that appeared to be aggression on the part of K states safeties, which we need to punish them for. Burns looked great, made some real strikes down the middle and on tough cross field out patterns. High hopes for him.
09-02-2016, 11:31 PM
(09-02-2016, 10:33 PM)gocard14 link Wrote:I don't think Scarlett was a problem, every time he had the ball there was a gang of defenders right in frontof him. He didn't make anything magical happen but it wasn't like he was missing open holes either a la rector on the reverse.
As mentioned above, more concerning was the o line play and not staying on blocks. C Mac had an uncanny ability to use blockers to shield himself even when that lineman didn't make a textbook block on the defender, but repeatedly tonight he was up against wide open unblocked defenders. Part of that appeared to be aggression on the part of K states safeties, which we need to punish them for. Burns looked great, made some real strikes down the middle and on tough cross field out patterns. High hopes for him.
Well I'm not saying that Scarlett was a problem, just that he's not Love, and I don't think he complements McCaffrey in the same way Love does. It seemed like the coaches tried to just sub him in for Love in weird ways and it didn't work. Also, really glad to know I wasn't crazy and Rector should've cut that reverse back. Looked like he had a blocker and a lot of green to work with if he had taken that lane...
(09-02-2016, 10:33 PM)gocard14 link Wrote:I don't think Scarlett was a problem, every time he had the ball there was a gang of defenders right in frontof him. He didn't make anything magical happen but it wasn't like he was missing open holes either a la rector on the reverse.
As mentioned above, more concerning was the o line play and not staying on blocks. C Mac had an uncanny ability to use blockers to shield himself even when that lineman didn't make a textbook block on the defender, but repeatedly tonight he was up against wide open unblocked defenders. Part of that appeared to be aggression on the part of K states safeties, which we need to punish them for. Burns looked great, made some real strikes down the middle and on tough cross field out patterns. High hopes for him.
Well I'm not saying that Scarlett was a problem, just that he's not Love, and I don't think he complements McCaffrey in the same way Love does. It seemed like the coaches tried to just sub him in for Love in weird ways and it didn't work. Also, really glad to know I wasn't crazy and Rector should've cut that reverse back. Looked like he had a blocker and a lot of green to work with if he had taken that lane...
09-02-2016, 11:38 PM
Let me put a cap on OUR FIRST WIN OF THE SEASON before I hit the sack.
![[Image: gru.gif]](https://becomingmrsmccully.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/gru.gif)
![[Image: giphy-11.gif]](https://tribzap2it.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/giphy-11.gif)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-03-2016, 11:49 AM
Also, I didn't understand why we ran Scarlett out wide. A big back like that should be getting North/South as quickly as possible and make himself tough to bring down; he's not going to outrun linebackers to the edge.
BC
BC
Also, I didn't understand why we ran Scarlett out wide. A big back like that should be getting North/South as quickly as possible and make himself tough to bring down; he's not going to outrun linebackers to the edge.
BC
BC
09-03-2016, 12:17 PM
(09-03-2016, 11:49 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:Also, I didn't understand why we ran Scarlett out wide. A big back like that should be getting North/South as quickly as possible and make himself tough to bring down; he's not going to outrun linebackers to the edge.
BC
Exactly, they tried to sub him in for Love and that made no sense. Before the game I didn't think losing Love would be that big of a deal, but it's clear that the coaches didn't totally know how to replace him and kind of made a hash of it. Might've cost us a TD...
(09-03-2016, 11:49 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:Also, I didn't understand why we ran Scarlett out wide. A big back like that should be getting North/South as quickly as possible and make himself tough to bring down; he's not going to outrun linebackers to the edge.
BC
Exactly, they tried to sub him in for Love and that made no sense. Before the game I didn't think losing Love would be that big of a deal, but it's clear that the coaches didn't totally know how to replace him and kind of made a hash of it. Might've cost us a TD...
09-03-2016, 02:17 PM
(09-03-2016, 01:48 PM)Mauser link Wrote:So what did the halftime show consist of. Hope it was a good one.
Joke about the olympics, nothing about your guys' show last year.
09-03-2016, 03:03 PM
Quote:And now, back from breaking stuff and lying about it in Rio... the one, the only, the truly incomparable... Leland Stanford Junior, Uniersity Marching Band!
The line was pretty funny, but the rest of the show kind of lame.
BC
Quote:And now, back from breaking stuff and lying about it in Rio... the one, the only, the truly incomparable... Leland Stanford Junior, Uniersity Marching Band!
The line was pretty funny, but the rest of the show kind of lame.
BC
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »