09-19-2016, 11:46 PM
Pop warner 47 Red Sanders 17.
Stanford @ UCLA predictions
09-20-2016, 06:09 AM
Stanford 34
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
Stanford 34
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
09-20-2016, 06:50 AM
"There she stood in the street." Paul Rodgers - 27
"Asian girls everywhere, UCLA." Childish Gambino - 23
"Asian girls everywhere, UCLA." Childish Gambino - 23
"There she stood in the street." Paul Rodgers - 27
"Asian girls everywhere, UCLA." Childish Gambino - 23
"Asian girls everywhere, UCLA." Childish Gambino - 23
09-20-2016, 10:04 AM
(09-20-2016, 06:09 AM)HisWildness link Wrote:Stanford 34
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
Welcome, HW
09-20-2016, 10:38 AM
I don't care what the score as long as Stanford has more points than UKLA when the final play is over!!
09-20-2016, 11:18 AM
Shouldn't we have home field advantage? After all, the game is in the Rose Bowl. ::)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-20-2016, 12:47 PM
The Tree 24
Joe and Josie Bruin 14
Shaw and the coaching staff always have the boys ready for UCLA, and I don't see this time being any different.
Joe and Josie Bruin 14
Shaw and the coaching staff always have the boys ready for UCLA, and I don't see this time being any different.
09-20-2016, 01:28 PM
Thought I had posted in this thread earlier but apparently not
Trees 34
Josephines 19
UCLA will move the ball between the 20s but will struggle in the RZ, resulting in a lot of FGs. The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense. Another day with 300 yards on the ground but 200 passing to go with it this time - Burns will not miss over the top twice like he did on Saturday.
Trees 34
Josephines 19
UCLA will move the ball between the 20s but will struggle in the RZ, resulting in a lot of FGs. The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense. Another day with 300 yards on the ground but 200 passing to go with it this time - Burns will not miss over the top twice like he did on Saturday.
Thought I had posted in this thread earlier but apparently not
Trees 34
Josephines 19
UCLA will move the ball between the 20s but will struggle in the RZ, resulting in a lot of FGs. The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense. Another day with 300 yards on the ground but 200 passing to go with it this time - Burns will not miss over the top twice like he did on Saturday.
Trees 34
Josephines 19
UCLA will move the ball between the 20s but will struggle in the RZ, resulting in a lot of FGs. The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense. Another day with 300 yards on the ground but 200 passing to go with it this time - Burns will not miss over the top twice like he did on Saturday.
09-20-2016, 01:48 PM
(09-20-2016, 01:28 PM)winflop link Wrote:The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense.
Why would you call UCLA's defense undermanned and inexperienced?
I believe they have something like 10 returning starters - though Vanderdoes is returning from two years ago. And their two-deep seems to be mostly juniors and seniors.
So far, they have played at least pretty well.
(09-20-2016, 01:28 PM)winflop link Wrote:The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense.
Why would you call UCLA's defense undermanned and inexperienced?
I believe they have something like 10 returning starters - though Vanderdoes is returning from two years ago. And their two-deep seems to be mostly juniors and seniors.
So far, they have played at least pretty well.
09-20-2016, 05:23 PM
Stanford 31
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Stanford 31
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
09-20-2016, 05:48 PM
(09-20-2016, 05:23 PM)Sonof80sCard link Wrote:Stanford 31
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Been a while since it's been a "different year..."
2015/10/15 UCLA   35 - Stanford 56 L              Â
2014/11/28 UCLA   10 - Stanford 31 L              Â
2013/10/19 UCLA   10 - Stanford 24 L              Â
2012/11/30 UCLA   24 - Stanford 27 L  ** PAC 12 CHAMPIONSHIP **
2012/11/24 UCLA   17 - Stanford 35 L              Â
2011/10/01 UCLA   19 - Stanford 45 L              Â
2010/09/11 UCLA    0 - Stanford 35 L              Â
2009/10/03 UCLA   16 - Stanford 24 LÂ
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(09-20-2016, 05:23 PM)Sonof80sCard link Wrote:Stanford 31
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Been a while since it's been a "different year..."
2015/10/15 UCLA   35 - Stanford 56 L              Â
2014/11/28 UCLA   10 - Stanford 31 L              Â
2013/10/19 UCLA   10 - Stanford 24 L              Â
2012/11/30 UCLA   24 - Stanford 27 L  ** PAC 12 CHAMPIONSHIP **
2012/11/24 UCLA   17 - Stanford 35 L              Â
2011/10/01 UCLA   19 - Stanford 45 L              Â
2010/09/11 UCLA    0 - Stanford 35 L              Â
2009/10/03 UCLA   16 - Stanford 24 LÂ
Audaces fortuna iuvat
09-20-2016, 05:57 PM
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl on New Years Day.        27
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl during the regular season.  17
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl during the regular season.  17
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl on New Years Day.        27
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl during the regular season.  17
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl during the regular season.  17
09-20-2016, 08:37 PM
(09-20-2016, 01:48 PM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=winflop link=topic=15712.msg172088#msg172088 date=1474403333]
The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense.
Why would you call UCLA's defense undermanned and inexperienced?
I believe they have something like 10 returning starters - though Vanderdoes is returning from two years ago. And their two-deep seems to be mostly juniors and seniors.
So far, they have played at least pretty well.
[/quote]
I thought they lost their best player from last year's team at each layer (DL, LB, DB) if not more than one? That was my basis for thinking that but maybe that wasn't correct.
(09-20-2016, 01:48 PM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=winflop link=topic=15712.msg172088#msg172088 date=1474403333]
The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense.
Why would you call UCLA's defense undermanned and inexperienced?
I believe they have something like 10 returning starters - though Vanderdoes is returning from two years ago. And their two-deep seems to be mostly juniors and seniors.
So far, they have played at least pretty well.
[/quote]
I thought they lost their best player from last year's team at each layer (DL, LB, DB) if not more than one? That was my basis for thinking that but maybe that wasn't correct.
09-20-2016, 09:40 PM
(09-19-2016, 08:21 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:I'll go with 50% of last year's score.
Stanford 28
Other guys 17
hahahahaha good call.
(09-19-2016, 08:21 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:I'll go with 50% of last year's score.
Stanford 28
Other guys 17
hahahahaha good call.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »