09-30-2016, 06:04 AM
Stanford 24
U-Dub 17
U-Dub 17
Stanford @ Washington predictions
09-30-2016, 11:10 AM
Looks like the weather will be decent for the game - we git 'er done!
Farm Boyz 27
Tirebiters 20
Farm Boyz 27
Tirebiters 20
09-30-2016, 11:10 AM
Looks like the weather will be decent for the game - we git 'er done!
Farm Boyz 27
Tirebiters 20
Farm Boyz 27
Tirebiters 20
09-30-2016, 11:10 AM
Looks like the weather will be decent for the game - we git 'er done!
Farm Boyz 27
Tirebiters 20
Farm Boyz 27
Tirebiters 20
09-30-2016, 02:08 PM
Boys (men) in Cardinal    31
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
Boys (men) in Cardinal    31
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
09-30-2016, 02:08 PM
Boys (men) in Cardinal    31
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
Boys (men) in Cardinal    31
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
09-30-2016, 02:08 PM
Boys (men) in Cardinal    31
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
Boys (men) in Cardinal    31
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
purple people eaters, but
not so much tonight      17
Based on my past picks, I have been pretty decent on the spread, but I have consistently overestimated our offensive output and underestimated our defense. If I actually learned anything, I would enter a score more like 24-10, but, since the price is right in this sweepstakes, I'll continue to be humiliated by entering the score I hope for. 31-17 is it.
09-30-2016, 02:54 PM
I don't really have a good feeling about today's game for whatever reason and the injured corners do not help.
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
I don't really have a good feeling about today's game for whatever reason and the injured corners do not help.
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
09-30-2016, 02:54 PM
I don't really have a good feeling about today's game for whatever reason and the injured corners do not help.
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
I don't really have a good feeling about today's game for whatever reason and the injured corners do not help.
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
09-30-2016, 02:54 PM
I don't really have a good feeling about today's game for whatever reason and the injured corners do not help.
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
I don't really have a good feeling about today's game for whatever reason and the injured corners do not help.
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
UW- 24
Stanford- 20
09-30-2016, 03:09 PM
Majestic Sequoias 31
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Majestic Sequoias 31
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
09-30-2016, 03:09 PM
Majestic Sequoias 31
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Majestic Sequoias 31
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
09-30-2016, 03:09 PM
Majestic Sequoias 31
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Majestic Sequoias 31
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
Cute Little Puppies 20
So far I have been predicting lower scores than most, as I've been nervous about the offense with an inexperienced QB and a 3/5 new OL. I've done well with that strategy, so might as well dump it now that everyone is predicting a low scoring game.
Actually am quite nervous about the opponent, injuries, and the general toll of the schedule so far.
BUT, I do think that the puppies' defense is more suspect this year than expected, particularly up front and I think the Huskies' offense remains untested; so lacking other evidence I am reverting to think it is unlikely to be all that much better than last year. Finally, I am hoping (without really believing) that the final drive vs UCLA gave both Burns and Shaw the confidence to add a more efficient passing game into the mix.
09-30-2016, 03:14 PM
(09-30-2016, 11:10 AM)PalmTree link Wrote:Looks like the weather will be decent for the game - we git 'er done!
Good weather in Seattle? That clinches it. We will drop the dawgs.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-30-2016, 03:14 PM
(09-30-2016, 11:10 AM)PalmTree link Wrote:Looks like the weather will be decent for the game - we git 'er done!
Good weather in Seattle? That clinches it. We will drop the dawgs.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-30-2016, 03:14 PM
(09-30-2016, 11:10 AM)PalmTree link Wrote:Looks like the weather will be decent for the game - we git 'er done!
Good weather in Seattle? That clinches it. We will drop the dawgs.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »