[BobK]

I no longer predict scores or season records.  Too maybe predictions of 8-4 in the Buddy and Walt years 😳

But I did tell the redcoat ticket taker 42 points for Stanford. 😎

Don't ban qwerty he gets excited easily 🎉

[BobK]

I no longer predict scores or season records.  Too maybe predictions of 8-4 in the Buddy and Walt years 😳

But I did tell the redcoat ticket taker 42 points for Stanford. 😎

Don't ban qwerty he gets excited easily 🎉

[Phogge]

Have we seen the prediction game scoreboard since the lamentable SDS game?  Perhaps I missed it?

Speaking of THAT game, I'm hoping to bleach the #%*! thing from my memory and go back to a time when SDS meant Hayden, Rudd and Dohrn rather than Penny and Long.

SDS is Steven Douglas Sabol. We all wear a special patch at NFL games. The best there ever was, the best who ever would be.

[Phogge]

Have we seen the prediction game scoreboard since the lamentable SDS game?  Perhaps I missed it?

Speaking of THAT game, I'm hoping to bleach the #%*! thing from my memory and go back to a time when SDS meant Hayden, Rudd and Dohrn rather than Penny and Long.

SDS is Steven Douglas Sabol. We all wear a special patch at NFL games. The best there ever was, the best who ever would be.

[Mick]

Kudos to Mick, who picked Stanford to lose (correctly as it happened) last time, and then to win (again, correctly) this time.  From now on, he is only allowed to pick wins.

Thanks everyone for participating.  I will work with BigEasyCard to get the cumulative rankings out later this week.

BC

P.S.  A couple people entered twice.  That's not a problem if the same score was already entered, but a potential problem if two different scores were selected.  Although I am sure these were inadvertent, to prevent attempts at manipulating the system, I suggest we take the less accurate one.

As long as Costello is quarterbacking, I'll keep projecting wins... :P  Actually, I noted on the Overly Complicated Statistics Site that we should be favored in all remaining games save for Washington.  I will predict wins on out.

As for entering twice, I'd just take the last one, as long as it's prior to kickoff.  Seems to me that's what they really intend.

[Mick]

Kudos to Mick, who picked Stanford to lose (correctly as it happened) last time, and then to win (again, correctly) this time.  From now on, he is only allowed to pick wins.

Thanks everyone for participating.  I will work with BigEasyCard to get the cumulative rankings out later this week.

BC

P.S.  A couple people entered twice.  That's not a problem if the same score was already entered, but a potential problem if two different scores were selected.  Although I am sure these were inadvertent, to prevent attempts at manipulating the system, I suggest we take the less accurate one.

As long as Costello is quarterbacking, I'll keep projecting wins... :P  Actually, I noted on the Overly Complicated Statistics Site that we should be favored in all remaining games save for Washington.  I will predict wins on out.

As for entering twice, I'd just take the last one, as long as it's prior to kickoff.  Seems to me that's what they really intend.

[BostonCard]

Taking the last one does make the most sense.  I was just being lazy, as taking the last one requires looking at each entry and finding out which had the later time stamp.

BC

[BostonCard]

Taking the last one does make the most sense.  I was just being lazy, as taking the last one requires looking at each entry and finding out which had the later time stamp.

BC

[hayaka]

I predicted Love and Scarlett would rush for 350 yards between them against the Bruins.  I was only off by one yard. 

:D

[hayaka]

I predicted Love and Scarlett would rush for 350 yards between them against the Bruins.  I was only off by one yard. 

:D

[Nan3cy]

[quote author=CompSci87 link=topic=17433.msg202908#msg202908 date=1506397341]
[quote author=qwerty49 link=topic=17433.msg202888#msg202888 date=1506389514]
LOL I honestly don't remember entering twice. But take the most inaccurate one as I really don't care and I'm very happy to be so wrong! BobK was impersonating me -- that's my story and Im sticking to it!

Or maybe it's BobK's story?
[/quote]

Well, it is true that we have never been seen in the same room together -- stadiums, final four venues and tailgates don't count!
[/quote]

And you look so much alike!  ;)

[Nan3cy]

[quote author=CompSci87 link=topic=17433.msg202908#msg202908 date=1506397341]
[quote author=qwerty49 link=topic=17433.msg202888#msg202888 date=1506389514]
LOL I honestly don't remember entering twice. But take the most inaccurate one as I really don't care and I'm very happy to be so wrong! BobK was impersonating me -- that's my story and Im sticking to it!

Or maybe it's BobK's story?
[/quote]

Well, it is true that we have never been seen in the same room together -- stadiums, final four venues and tailgates don't count!
[/quote]

And you look so much alike!  ;)