02-09-2018, 11:28 AM
(02-09-2018, 07:57 AM)winflop link Wrote:If Rosen had played, then Costello would not have been injured, not needed surgery, and would be available for spring ball.
At $C!
Davis Mills update
At $C!
(02-09-2018, 07:57 AM)winflop link Wrote:If Rosen had played, then Costello would not have been injured, not needed surgery, and would be available for spring ball.
At $C!
02-09-2018, 11:28 AM
(02-09-2018, 07:57 AM)winflop link Wrote:If Rosen had played, then Costello would not have been injured, not needed surgery, and would be available for spring ball.
At $C!
(02-09-2018, 07:57 AM)winflop link Wrote:If Rosen had played, then Costello would not have been injured, not needed surgery, and would be available for spring ball.
At $C!
02-09-2018, 11:55 AM
(02-09-2018, 06:46 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.Â
(02-09-2018, 06:46 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.Â
02-09-2018, 11:55 AM
(02-09-2018, 06:46 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.Â
(02-09-2018, 06:46 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.Â
02-09-2018, 12:55 PM
(02-09-2018, 11:55 AM)ColoradoTree link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=18698.msg223520#msg223520 date=1518183973]
Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.
[/quote]
OK so Costello goes elsewhere, but then we offer someone else. Point is, you would have a scholarship QB available for spring camp. Bigger point is we need to have a scholarship QB in every class, and this is an example of why.
(02-09-2018, 11:55 AM)ColoradoTree link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=18698.msg223520#msg223520 date=1518183973]
Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.
[/quote]
OK so Costello goes elsewhere, but then we offer someone else. Point is, you would have a scholarship QB available for spring camp. Bigger point is we need to have a scholarship QB in every class, and this is an example of why.
02-09-2018, 12:55 PM
(02-09-2018, 11:55 AM)ColoradoTree link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=18698.msg223520#msg223520 date=1518183973]
Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.
[/quote]
OK so Costello goes elsewhere, but then we offer someone else. Point is, you would have a scholarship QB available for spring camp. Bigger point is we need to have a scholarship QB in every class, and this is an example of why.
(02-09-2018, 11:55 AM)ColoradoTree link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=18698.msg223520#msg223520 date=1518183973]
Had we taken Rosen, Costello might have gone to U$C. He stated that Stanford not taking a QB in 2015 was one of the reasons he chose us.
This is the point I think we're forgetting here. Costello isn't here if we had taken Rosen. Perhaps we sign someone else in that class, perhaps we don't, but we had K.J. locked in so early that I don't think any other quarterback recruitment advanced too far, if at all. Heck, if we take Rosen, we might have struck out entirely in the class of 2016, as I'm pretty sure we never offered the other top QBs in that class. We probably still land Mills, but that gap might well still be there in the "we land Rosen" hypothetical--just pushed back a year.
[/quote]
OK so Costello goes elsewhere, but then we offer someone else. Point is, you would have a scholarship QB available for spring camp. Bigger point is we need to have a scholarship QB in every class, and this is an example of why.
02-09-2018, 02:08 PM
(02-09-2018, 01:29 PM)BobK link Wrote:Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
02-09-2018, 02:08 PM
(02-09-2018, 01:29 PM)BobK link Wrote:Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
02-09-2018, 02:35 PM
(02-09-2018, 02:08 PM)qwerty49 link Wrote:[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
(02-09-2018, 02:08 PM)qwerty49 link Wrote:[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
02-09-2018, 02:35 PM
(02-09-2018, 02:08 PM)qwerty49 link Wrote:[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
(02-09-2018, 02:08 PM)qwerty49 link Wrote:[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
(02-09-2018, 02:35 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=qwerty49 link=topic=18698.msg223577#msg223577 date=1518210513]
[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
[/quote]
Yes, hence the emoticons. Recalibrate your sarcasm meter!
(02-09-2018, 02:35 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=qwerty49 link=topic=18698.msg223577#msg223577 date=1518210513]
[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
[/quote]
Yes, hence the emoticons. Recalibrate your sarcasm meter!
(02-09-2018, 02:35 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=qwerty49 link=topic=18698.msg223577#msg223577 date=1518210513]
[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
[/quote]
Yes, hence the emoticons. Recalibrate your sarcasm meter!
(02-09-2018, 02:35 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=qwerty49 link=topic=18698.msg223577#msg223577 date=1518210513]
[quote author=BobK link=topic=18698.msg223572#msg223572 date=1518208195]
Or the unknown QB could also be injured.
LOL that post just sent dozens of people scurrying to figure out who the unknown QB is of which you speak. ;D
All hail the all-knowing BobK! :)
[/quote]
He meant hypothetical, since we're talking about a hypothetical world where we take more QBs than we have.
[/quote]
Yes, hence the emoticons. Recalibrate your sarcasm meter!
02-09-2018, 03:16 PM
To the Administrators:
I've got a suggestion for a system autocorrect. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
I've got a suggestion for a system autocorrect. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
Please clear the field! The game is not over!
02-09-2018, 03:16 PM
To the Administrators:
I've got a suggestion for a system autocorrect. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
I've got a suggestion for a system autocorrect. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
Please clear the field! The game is not over!
02-09-2018, 07:49 PM
(02-09-2018, 03:16 PM)Hank 91 link Wrote:To the Administrators:Or just replace "Rosen". I suggest as a replacement "The Road Not Taken."
I've got a suggestion for a system All Powerful and All Knowing CardBoard Software. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
(02-09-2018, 03:16 PM)Hank 91 link Wrote:To the Administrators:Or just replace "Rosen". I suggest as a replacement "The Road Not Taken."
I've got a suggestion for a system All Powerful and All Knowing CardBoard Software. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
02-09-2018, 07:49 PM
(02-09-2018, 03:16 PM)Hank 91 link Wrote:To the Administrators:Or just replace "Rosen". I suggest as a replacement "The Road Not Taken."
I've got a suggestion for a system All Powerful and All Knowing CardBoard Software. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
(02-09-2018, 03:16 PM)Hank 91 link Wrote:To the Administrators:Or just replace "Rosen". I suggest as a replacement "The Road Not Taken."
I've got a suggestion for a system All Powerful and All Knowing CardBoard Software. This phrase ("If we had taken Rosen") should be replaced with this phrase (" ").
Thank you for your consideration.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »