Im jumping for Joy. One of the best if not the best three shooter in the country
https://mobile.twitter.com/darrensabedra...28736?s=12
https://mobile.twitter.com/darrensabedra...28736?s=12
WBB: new commit
Im jumping for Joy. One of the best if not the best three shooter in the country
https://mobile.twitter.com/darrensabedra...28736?s=12
https://mobile.twitter.com/darrensabedra...28736?s=12
02-16-2018, 02:11 PM
How is the rest of her game? Is there enough athleticism so she can hold her own on defense? I remember the last time I was worried that we may have landed a shooting specialist without a strong all-around game it turned out to be Karlie. One can only hope that Hannah's game evolves in the same direction.
How is the rest of her game? Is there enough athleticism so she can hold her own on defense? I remember the last time I was worried that we may have landed a shooting specialist without a strong all-around game it turned out to be Karlie. One can only hope that Hannah's game evolves in the same direction.
02-16-2018, 02:39 PM
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
02-16-2018, 02:46 PM
I saw her play as a Frosh iirc. But certainly not since. Ill be at State hope Pinewood makes it that far.
02-16-2018, 02:58 PM
WWB? I thought maybe we had a new commit in women's water bolo.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
WWB? I thought maybe we had a new commit in women's water bolo.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
02-16-2018, 03:03 PM
(02-16-2018, 02:58 PM)Spiny_Norman link Wrote:WWB? I thought maybe we had a new commit in women's water bolo.
I thought it might be women's water basketball. Those floating hoops can be tough to hit. . . .
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
(02-16-2018, 02:58 PM)Spiny_Norman link Wrote:WWB? I thought maybe we had a new commit in women's water bolo.
I thought it might be women's water basketball. Those floating hoops can be tough to hit. . . .
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
02-16-2018, 03:21 PM
from July 2017
Nevertheless, Jump made a name for herself.
Hannah made shot after shot in front of hundreds of college coaches and against the top defenders in the country, said Stars coach Kelly Sopak, also the head coach at East Bay power Miramonte. I can honestly say Im not sure I have coached or coached against a more prolific shooter than Hannah Jump. She is a once in a lifetime talent with a bright future.
According to Sopak, a short list of colleges to have expressed an interest in Jump include Stanford, Cal, Notre Dame, Washington, Tennessee, Arizona, USC, UCLA and Oregon.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2017...basketball
Nevertheless, Jump made a name for herself.
Hannah made shot after shot in front of hundreds of college coaches and against the top defenders in the country, said Stars coach Kelly Sopak, also the head coach at East Bay power Miramonte. I can honestly say Im not sure I have coached or coached against a more prolific shooter than Hannah Jump. She is a once in a lifetime talent with a bright future.
According to Sopak, a short list of colleges to have expressed an interest in Jump include Stanford, Cal, Notre Dame, Washington, Tennessee, Arizona, USC, UCLA and Oregon.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2017...basketball
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
from July 2017
Nevertheless, Jump made a name for herself.
Hannah made shot after shot in front of hundreds of college coaches and against the top defenders in the country, said Stars coach Kelly Sopak, also the head coach at East Bay power Miramonte. I can honestly say Im not sure I have coached or coached against a more prolific shooter than Hannah Jump. She is a once in a lifetime talent with a bright future.
According to Sopak, a short list of colleges to have expressed an interest in Jump include Stanford, Cal, Notre Dame, Washington, Tennessee, Arizona, USC, UCLA and Oregon.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2017...basketball
Nevertheless, Jump made a name for herself.
Hannah made shot after shot in front of hundreds of college coaches and against the top defenders in the country, said Stars coach Kelly Sopak, also the head coach at East Bay power Miramonte. I can honestly say Im not sure I have coached or coached against a more prolific shooter than Hannah Jump. She is a once in a lifetime talent with a bright future.
According to Sopak, a short list of colleges to have expressed an interest in Jump include Stanford, Cal, Notre Dame, Washington, Tennessee, Arizona, USC, UCLA and Oregon.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2017...basketball
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
(02-16-2018, 03:03 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=Spiny_Norman link=topic=18742.msg224092#msg224092 date=1518818306]
WWB? I thought maybe we had a new commit in women's water bolo.
I thought it might be women's water basketball. Those floating hoops can be tough to hit. . . .
[/quote]
Or maybe that Women's Water Balloon throwing is now a sport.
I've edited the subject in the OP now...
Anyway, we surely have recruited the world's greatest Jump shooter. ;)
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2018, 03:29 PM by CompSci87.)
(02-16-2018, 03:03 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=Spiny_Norman link=topic=18742.msg224092#msg224092 date=1518818306]
WWB? I thought maybe we had a new commit in women's water bolo.
I thought it might be women's water basketball. Those floating hoops can be tough to hit. . . .
[/quote]
Or maybe that Women's Water Balloon throwing is now a sport.
I've edited the subject in the OP now...
Anyway, we surely have recruited the world's greatest Jump shooter. ;)
02-16-2018, 04:59 PM
(02-16-2018, 04:51 PM)mbdude link Wrote:playing for England - # 6Wow, she looks excellent on the video. Hits shots from all over, both catch-and-shoot and off the dribble. 3-pointers, midrange pullups, layups. She has good size and strength going to the basket. Has some assists on the video too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgm9YUWuF-w
(02-16-2018, 04:51 PM)mbdude link Wrote:playing for England - # 6Wow, she looks excellent on the video. Hits shots from all over, both catch-and-shoot and off the dribble. 3-pointers, midrange pullups, layups. She has good size and strength going to the basket. Has some assists on the video too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgm9YUWuF-w
02-16-2018, 05:30 PM
She looks good on video and we certainly can use a reliable sharpshooter. I liked the variety of shots she was making. At 5'11" she has a little more height than some of our very short guards--just an inch shorter than Britt. All that I like, and as a local there is every reason to believe that she has been very, very, very carefully scouted by our coaches.
I wonder why ESPN/Olsen gives her such a mediocre rating (90, 3 stars, not in the top 60.) She is the #63 from Prospects Nation. Bonnie was 61, Karlie was 77--so sometimes the pure shooters get underrated and turn out quite well. But sometimes they don't. Jump's ranking would be somewhere between Brewer's and Wilson's when they were recruited.
I wonder why ESPN/Olsen gives her such a mediocre rating (90, 3 stars, not in the top 60.) She is the #63 from Prospects Nation. Bonnie was 61, Karlie was 77--so sometimes the pure shooters get underrated and turn out quite well. But sometimes they don't. Jump's ranking would be somewhere between Brewer's and Wilson's when they were recruited.
She looks good on video and we certainly can use a reliable sharpshooter. I liked the variety of shots she was making. At 5'11" she has a little more height than some of our very short guards--just an inch shorter than Britt. All that I like, and as a local there is every reason to believe that she has been very, very, very carefully scouted by our coaches.
I wonder why ESPN/Olsen gives her such a mediocre rating (90, 3 stars, not in the top 60.) She is the #63 from Prospects Nation. Bonnie was 61, Karlie was 77--so sometimes the pure shooters get underrated and turn out quite well. But sometimes they don't. Jump's ranking would be somewhere between Brewer's and Wilson's when they were recruited.
I wonder why ESPN/Olsen gives her such a mediocre rating (90, 3 stars, not in the top 60.) She is the #63 from Prospects Nation. Bonnie was 61, Karlie was 77--so sometimes the pure shooters get underrated and turn out quite well. But sometimes they don't. Jump's ranking would be somewhere between Brewer's and Wilson's when they were recruited.
02-17-2018, 12:23 AM
Could be she's lower ranked because she's from a tiny school, Pinewood, with 300 total students in grades 7-12 as opposed to a perennial sports powerhouse like say Mater Dei with 2,100 students in grades 9-12. Means lesser competition and less exposure too, so could be a bit of an unknown quantity to ESPN.
Could be she's lower ranked because she's from a tiny school, Pinewood, with 300 total students in grades 7-12 as opposed to a perennial sports powerhouse like say Mater Dei with 2,100 students in grades 9-12. Means lesser competition and less exposure too, so could be a bit of an unknown quantity to ESPN.
02-17-2018, 02:08 AM
Hmmm...her release point seems relatively low, but she gets it off quickly. And wow, can't argue with the results. What touch she has. And yes, not just a long-range bomber.
02-17-2018, 08:46 AM
Rankings are more based on travel than HS play and Jump plays on Cal Stars one of the best in the country.  Same team as Ionescu snd McGuire before Jones and DeCosta this past spring and summer
Like at the rankings of the Samuelsons at Stanford and Tudor at Oregon state. Â
Like at the rankings of the Samuelsons at Stanford and Tudor at Oregon state. Â
Rankings are more based on travel than HS play and Jump plays on Cal Stars one of the best in the country.  Same team as Ionescu snd McGuire before Jones and DeCosta this past spring and summer
Like at the rankings of the Samuelsons at Stanford and Tudor at Oregon state. Â
Like at the rankings of the Samuelsons at Stanford and Tudor at Oregon state. Â
02-18-2018, 09:30 AM
Super late to the game on this after a week of travel, but excited to hear about Jump. Her highlight reel was really promising, making shots from outside, inside, in transition, and in traffic. She also had a couple pretty assists from long range. It's always hard to tell with these "tapes" because who knows if that's how she is 20% of the time or 75% of the time, but I'm encouraged. I also don't think the difference between PN and ESPNW HoopGurlz says much at all - ESPN indicates she is top 100 but they are only identifying top 60 for now, which could be entirely consistent with her #63 PN ranking. Also, the ESPN evaluation from Olson is dated July 2014, yes, almost 4 years ago. So who knows if their ranking is based on that assessment, or what. I generally find there's a lot of shuffling until they settle on their Top 100 about a year ahead of the formal signing period. Indeed, I remember Wilson was at one point as high as, I think, #6 in the nation, but I think where she ultimately landed, at #42, was a more accurate position. On the men's team, Robbie Cartwright was at one point (i.e., when he committed) solidly in the Top 60, and he didn't even end up being ranked in the end. I would say that has panned out in terms of his performance on the team. I really only trust the final rankings, and even that, as BobK has noted, is subject to politics, etc.
Now, we just really need some height in our remaining three recruits. I'm hopeful that ESPNW listed Stanford as Amihere's top considering - that list is ordinarily in alphabetical order, so the fact that it's not here makes me hope ESPN knows something about her order of priority. We were previously in the running for Ramani Parker, but she committed a few weeks ago to Louisville. She's only ranked 58th, so that's not a brobdingnagian loss, but I haven't heard too much else about other plausible top bigs.
Now, we just really need some height in our remaining three recruits. I'm hopeful that ESPNW listed Stanford as Amihere's top considering - that list is ordinarily in alphabetical order, so the fact that it's not here makes me hope ESPN knows something about her order of priority. We were previously in the running for Ramani Parker, but she committed a few weeks ago to Louisville. She's only ranked 58th, so that's not a brobdingnagian loss, but I haven't heard too much else about other plausible top bigs.
Super late to the game on this after a week of travel, but excited to hear about Jump. Her highlight reel was really promising, making shots from outside, inside, in transition, and in traffic. She also had a couple pretty assists from long range. It's always hard to tell with these "tapes" because who knows if that's how she is 20% of the time or 75% of the time, but I'm encouraged. I also don't think the difference between PN and ESPNW HoopGurlz says much at all - ESPN indicates she is top 100 but they are only identifying top 60 for now, which could be entirely consistent with her #63 PN ranking. Also, the ESPN evaluation from Olson is dated July 2014, yes, almost 4 years ago. So who knows if their ranking is based on that assessment, or what. I generally find there's a lot of shuffling until they settle on their Top 100 about a year ahead of the formal signing period. Indeed, I remember Wilson was at one point as high as, I think, #6 in the nation, but I think where she ultimately landed, at #42, was a more accurate position. On the men's team, Robbie Cartwright was at one point (i.e., when he committed) solidly in the Top 60, and he didn't even end up being ranked in the end. I would say that has panned out in terms of his performance on the team. I really only trust the final rankings, and even that, as BobK has noted, is subject to politics, etc.
Now, we just really need some height in our remaining three recruits. I'm hopeful that ESPNW listed Stanford as Amihere's top considering - that list is ordinarily in alphabetical order, so the fact that it's not here makes me hope ESPN knows something about her order of priority. We were previously in the running for Ramani Parker, but she committed a few weeks ago to Louisville. She's only ranked 58th, so that's not a brobdingnagian loss, but I haven't heard too much else about other plausible top bigs.
Now, we just really need some height in our remaining three recruits. I'm hopeful that ESPNW listed Stanford as Amihere's top considering - that list is ordinarily in alphabetical order, so the fact that it's not here makes me hope ESPN knows something about her order of priority. We were previously in the running for Ramani Parker, but she committed a few weeks ago to Louisville. She's only ranked 58th, so that's not a brobdingnagian loss, but I haven't heard too much else about other plausible top bigs.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »