(04-20-2020, 05:28 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: (04-20-2020, 05:04 PM)Farm93 Wrote: This does not appear to be a good choice for an early ending of social distancing.
From what I've read about Georgia, they are NOT ending social distancing. They are opening businesses that will enforce social distancing in their establishments. The devil is in the details and the proof will be in the pudding, but, it will be the new normal we all will be facing. Glad they're giving it a go and I hope they're successful, especially as I've family in Atlanta.
How exactly does one get a massage without violating social distancing?
How does one get their hair styled at a salon without violating social distancing?
Maybe customer-to-customer social distancing will be maintained, but social distancing will be ending. In either setting employees will touch and be very close to almost a dozen customers per day even if customer-to-customer distancing remains enforced.
The choice of businesses in this directive sounds really quirky, and I can't help but think about that one compilation of Italian Mayors where the mayor asks/explains why you need your hair styled in your closed casket.
I fear without appropriate testing or tracing Emory will be VERY busy in mid-May. The mayor of Atlanta sounds disappointed. I think she knows this is happening now for all the wrong reasons. If I had family in GA I would tell them they will be MUCH safer-at-home for the next three weeks.
FWIW - For those eager to give things a try I would have thought Texas has the best case. Given that state's low population density areas, fondness for using space, and relatively low COVID death rate, I think they make a better case study. Still too early even for them IMO, but at least it makes more sense than GA.