06-06-2021, 06:59 AM
Life is too short to waste on crap football.
(06-06-2021, 06:59 AM)gailtate Wrote: https://awfulannouncing.com/ncaa/stanfor...t-fox.html
(06-06-2021, 06:59 AM)gailtate Wrote: https://awfulannouncing.com/ncaa/stanfor...t-fox.html
(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
(06-06-2021, 09:32 AM)lex24 Wrote:(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
The COVID board was ended a long time ago. Article has nothing to do with COVID.
(06-06-2021, 09:32 AM)lex24 Wrote:(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
The COVID board was ended a long time ago. Article has nothing to do with COVID.
(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
Quote:"We are bitterly disappointed that the great Oklahoma-Nebraska rivalry, on the 50th anniversary of the Game of the Century, will kick off at 11 a.m. [local time]," Castiglione said in a statement. "We tried every possible avenue to proactively make our case. The Big 12 Conference also supported our strenuous efforts to secure a more traditional time that would honor this game and our fans. However, in the end, our TV partner chose to exercise its full contractual rights and denied our requests."
(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
Quote:"We are bitterly disappointed that the great Oklahoma-Nebraska rivalry, on the 50th anniversary of the Game of the Century, will kick off at 11 a.m. [local time]," Castiglione said in a statement. "We tried every possible avenue to proactively make our case. The Big 12 Conference also supported our strenuous efforts to secure a more traditional time that would honor this game and our fans. However, in the end, our TV partner chose to exercise its full contractual rights and denied our requests."
(06-06-2021, 01:14 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote:(06-06-2021, 09:32 AM)lex24 Wrote:(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
The COVID board was ended a long time ago. Article has nothing to do with COVID.
And out of 317 words, just 53 words had anything to do with Covid, so that's not what the post was mostly about and you are well smart enough to know it. Address the thrust of the post comprised by the other 264 words, or no need to respond.
(06-06-2021, 01:14 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote:(06-06-2021, 09:32 AM)lex24 Wrote:(06-06-2021, 08:59 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Like most fan bases, Stanford fans are front-runners. But most fan bases also have "optimism springs eternal" feelings about new seasons, and are there to support their teams in national showcase games like Stanford is playing in Arlington vs. Kansas State, no matter the game time. It's also common that fan bases will travel to see a big OOC game and kind of make a vacation out of it.
But, given the potential caution of Stanford fans about the global - not just in U.S. pandemic - and the fact the game is in Texas, a state not taking any precautions, I'd assume, an already reluctant to travel for any game Stanford fan base, might have its representation depressed by both pandemic concerns and also potentially not being enthused about the Football team.
All this is to say, David Shaw shouldn't be publicly complaining about anything regarding this game and only give already likely less than chomping at the bit Stanford fans reasons TO attend the neutral site made for TV event, not justify skipping it. I'm concerned about 500 Stanford fans will show and all anyone will talk about is how Stanford fans don't support David Shaw and/or his program. I hope this isn't some sort of pre-emptive strike he is putting out only because he's feeling low ticket sales to Stanford fans and wants to create an excuse for what he fears will be paltry fan support at AT&T Stadium.
The early start time Cal had in Oxford didn't stop them from knocking off Ole Miss in their home stadium. Complaining about start times, no matter the motivation, is a bad look. That stuff is negotiated between the schools, conferences and TV networks, and Shaw knows it. If 9am PST games are a non-starter for you, make it a negotiating chip when doing the contracts to schedule and broadcast the games.
The COVID board was ended a long time ago. Article has nothing to do with COVID.
And out of 317 words, just 53 words had anything to do with Covid, so that's not what the post was mostly about and you are well smart enough to know it. Address the thrust of the post comprised by the other 264 words, or no need to respond.
(06-06-2021, 01:32 PM)oman Wrote: Didn't we start the home games at 11 am back in the early 80s? So as someone who will be the game, that's kind of nostalgic.
(06-06-2021, 05:31 PM)BobK Wrote: maybe I’m a bit older but games were at 2:00 for years
(06-06-2021, 05:31 PM)BobK Wrote: maybe I’m a bit older but games were at 2:00 for years
(06-07-2021, 07:59 AM)Phogge Wrote:(06-06-2021, 05:31 PM)BobK Wrote: maybe I’m a bit older but games were at 2:00 for years
"Maybe." LOL
I remember the 2pm starts but at some point the starts were at 1:30, for years. Bobbbbbbbb, what was the first night game? Texas or Colorado perhaps. They did play a bunch of night games in the Coliseum in the 50's and 60's. Sometimes SC played on a Friday night, UCLA daytime Saturday and the Rams on Sunday.
Back in my day at Kezar there was a HS game on Thursday and Friday, CCSF on Friday night and the Niners on Sunday. Until 1952 USF and sometimes St. Mary's played their home games at Kezar. No wonder the grass disappeared between the 20's in October.
(06-07-2021, 07:59 AM)Phogge Wrote:(06-06-2021, 05:31 PM)BobK Wrote: maybe I’m a bit older but games were at 2:00 for years
"Maybe." LOL
I remember the 2pm starts but at some point the starts were at 1:30, for years. Bobbbbbbbb, what was the first night game? Texas or Colorado perhaps. They did play a bunch of night games in the Coliseum in the 50's and 60's. Sometimes SC played on a Friday night, UCLA daytime Saturday and the Rams on Sunday.
Back in my day at Kezar there was a HS game on Thursday and Friday, CCSF on Friday night and the Niners on Sunday. Until 1952 USF and sometimes St. Mary's played their home games at Kezar. No wonder the grass disappeared between the 20's in October.