11-06-2011, 11:09 AM
We obviously need to get healthier for the Oregon game. But having certain guys sidelined would hurt more than others. Here's how I'd rank the ranks of the injured, from most important for our chances against Oregon to least important.
1) Fleming. If Mabry starts, I think he's likely to commit at least one and maybe two drive-killing penalties. That is crucial in a game like this. In addition, the pass protection will be better if Fleming plays. I really hope that he was held out of the OSU game out of caution and with the big picture of the entire season in mind.
2) Howell. Without his tackling, a 10-yard run by the Ducks' explosive backs can easily become an 80-yard run. Again, I hope this is a situation where Delano could have played against the Beavers, but the coaching staff realized it made sense to get him as close to 100% as possible for Nov. 12.
2a) Williamson. The difference in kickoffs between Williamson and Whitaker has been big. We can't afford to help the Ducks' offense by giving them great field position.
4) Ertz/Toilolo (tie). These guys are both great players for us, but I think we have more ways to cover for their absences than the guys above them on this list. Hopefully at least one of them will play, though - Shaw said last night that Levine will be ready.
6) Browning. No one's talking about this injury - anyone have any idea what happened? - but losing him would hurt our depth at CB. I like Brown as a replacement starter, but depth all across the defense is always a key against the Ducks.
I'm not including Owusu on this list because I don't think he will or should play.
1) Fleming. If Mabry starts, I think he's likely to commit at least one and maybe two drive-killing penalties. That is crucial in a game like this. In addition, the pass protection will be better if Fleming plays. I really hope that he was held out of the OSU game out of caution and with the big picture of the entire season in mind.
2) Howell. Without his tackling, a 10-yard run by the Ducks' explosive backs can easily become an 80-yard run. Again, I hope this is a situation where Delano could have played against the Beavers, but the coaching staff realized it made sense to get him as close to 100% as possible for Nov. 12.
2a) Williamson. The difference in kickoffs between Williamson and Whitaker has been big. We can't afford to help the Ducks' offense by giving them great field position.
4) Ertz/Toilolo (tie). These guys are both great players for us, but I think we have more ways to cover for their absences than the guys above them on this list. Hopefully at least one of them will play, though - Shaw said last night that Levine will be ready.
6) Browning. No one's talking about this injury - anyone have any idea what happened? - but losing him would hurt our depth at CB. I like Brown as a replacement starter, but depth all across the defense is always a key against the Ducks.
I'm not including Owusu on this list because I don't think he will or should play.


