(01-04-2022, 01:27 PM)Phogge Wrote: Insist on a refund. With interest.
And why can’t they just say “A.D. Bernard...” Who are Jaquash and Kenmitzer anyway?
Imagine, Stanford can sell a few thousand tickets to sporting events BUT the women's team ends up with 4 or 5 losses because of COVID-19 protocol misses. In that scenario Stanford gets a 5 seed instead of a 1 seed. Or worse, imagine Stanford gets stuck with COVID-19 protocol challenges in late February and therefore can't compete in the NCAA tournament.
Given's the WBB team's success last year, I am all for them not playing in front of crowds if that can increase their odds of a successful title defense.
I realize those things are not mutually exclusive, but I think the risk of COVID-19 protocol related losses in January is high enough that the AD should be allowed to do everything possible to keep the team eligible to play as the #1 seed is simply too valuable to risk for a less than a million in ticket revenue.
This logic COULD apply to MBB too, but we all know MBB isn't going to win in March so if not for Title IX issues I wouldn't care if the AD had fans in the stands for MBB.
FWIW - I am assuming everyone on the WBB team is vaccinated and would do OK should they get the Omicron variant of COVID.
Most of the other winter sports don't really have big crowds, so this decision really is about basketball. The MBB team probably could benefit from a formal excuse for their poor attendance and the WBB that has a lot to lose if COVID-19 takes away a number of games or makes them ineligible for the tournament.
I suspect formally limiting attendance likely creates a bigger financial hit for the AD as a number of MBB fans will get refunds for games they were unlikely to attend given Omicron and the team's record. So props to the AD for taking a more expensive route if this preemptive move allows the WBB to keep playing (and winning) in Santa Clara county.