02-24-2022, 04:19 PM
WBB - 2021-22 Awards & Lexie WINS Senior Class Award
02-24-2022, 04:27 PM
(02-24-2022, 04:19 PM)teejers1 Wrote:I know we are not being paid to vote for Lexie -- at least I wasn't -- but this overkill of 79.1% of the votes reminds me of a statement supposedly made by JFK after he won a presidential primary election in 1960 and his opponents alleged that his rich daddy had bought votes for him: "I want to read you a telegram from my generous dad: 'Jack, don't buy a single vote more than you need. I'll be damned if I'll pay for a landslide.'"(02-24-2022, 01:05 PM)WBB fan Wrote:(02-24-2022, 12:47 PM)martyup Wrote: Up to 79.1%. Push it over 80!
Keep it going! I've voted 30 times today.
If Lexie wins, she should make sure you are in a picture with her holding the trophy . . .
(02-24-2022, 04:19 PM)teejers1 Wrote:I know we are not being paid to vote for Lexie -- at least I wasn't -- but this overkill of 79.1% of the votes reminds me of a statement supposedly made by JFK after he won a presidential primary election in 1960 and his opponents alleged that his rich daddy had bought votes for him: "I want to read you a telegram from my generous dad: 'Jack, don't buy a single vote more than you need. I'll be damned if I'll pay for a landslide.'"(02-24-2022, 01:05 PM)WBB fan Wrote:(02-24-2022, 12:47 PM)martyup Wrote: Up to 79.1%. Push it over 80!
Keep it going! I've voted 30 times today.
If Lexie wins, she should make sure you are in a picture with her holding the trophy . . .
02-24-2022, 04:42 PM
I voted about 10 times and got it up a tenth of a point to 79.4.
After all the Voldemort debacles I want to make sure this one doesn't slip away from us.
After all the Voldemort debacles I want to make sure this one doesn't slip away from us.
02-24-2022, 04:51 PM
(02-24-2022, 04:42 PM)81alum Wrote: I voted about 10 times and got it up a tenth of a point to 79.4.
After all the Voldemort debacles I want to make sure this one doesn't slip away from us.
Absolutely right, don't let it slip away -- never have succeeded with this in the past even when had great, great Stanford stars nominated. Just voted about 10 more times, now up to 79.5 (at least when I left the site). I'm determined, but we need lots of us to vote. There are several weeks left and need to keep it up.
(02-24-2022, 04:42 PM)81alum Wrote: I voted about 10 times and got it up a tenth of a point to 79.4.
After all the Voldemort debacles I want to make sure this one doesn't slip away from us.
Absolutely right, don't let it slip away -- never have succeeded with this in the past even when had great, great Stanford stars nominated. Just voted about 10 more times, now up to 79.5 (at least when I left the site). I'm determined, but we need lots of us to vote. There are several weeks left and need to keep it up.
Bump!
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Bump!
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
02-25-2022, 06:07 PM
(02-25-2022, 01:21 PM)bl82 Wrote: Bump!
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Hey, we’re getting complacent! It was down to 79.9% - just voted enough to goose it back up to 80% Let’s keep voting - early and often!
(02-25-2022, 01:21 PM)bl82 Wrote: Bump!
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Hey, we’re getting complacent! It was down to 79.9% - just voted enough to goose it back up to 80% Let’s keep voting - early and often!
02-25-2022, 06:20 PM
(02-25-2022, 06:07 PM)UltimateCard Wrote:(02-25-2022, 01:21 PM)bl82 Wrote: Bump!
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Just voted 10 times (after many more earlier today) -- now up to 80.1%
Hey, we’re getting complacent! It was down to 79.9% - just voted enough to goose it back up to 80% Let’s keep voting - early and often!
(02-25-2022, 06:07 PM)UltimateCard Wrote:(02-25-2022, 01:21 PM)bl82 Wrote: Bump!
Still going strong at 80.0%, but recall that fan balloting counts for only 1/3 of the total with the remaining 2/3 determined by NCAA Division I coaches and members of the national media
https://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/wo...ll_2021_22
Just voted 10 times (after many more earlier today) -- now up to 80.1%
Hey, we’re getting complacent! It was down to 79.9% - just voted enough to goose it back up to 80% Let’s keep voting - early and often!
03-08-2022, 08:34 PM
03-14-2022, 02:39 PM
Lexie is almost to 90%. Keep voting and push her over. How can they deny her the title if 90% of fans choose her?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
03-15-2022, 10:36 AM
(03-14-2022, 10:27 PM)M T Wrote:(03-14-2022, 02:39 PM)martyup Wrote: Lexie is almost to 90%. Keep voting and push her over. How can they deny her the title if 90% of fans choose her?Because it isn’t 90% of fans.
Sorry, let me re-phrase that.
Lexie is almost to 90%. Keep voting and push her over. How can they deny her the title if 90% of the votes made on the website they established are going to Lexie?
They can do what they like with their award, but why establish an online fan voting system if they intend to ignore an overwhelming voting preference?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(03-14-2022, 10:27 PM)M T Wrote:(03-14-2022, 02:39 PM)martyup Wrote: Lexie is almost to 90%. Keep voting and push her over. How can they deny her the title if 90% of fans choose her?Because it isn’t 90% of fans.
Sorry, let me re-phrase that.
Lexie is almost to 90%. Keep voting and push her over. How can they deny her the title if 90% of the votes made on the website they established are going to Lexie?
They can do what they like with their award, but why establish an online fan voting system if they intend to ignore an overwhelming voting preference?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
That near 90% is indeed overwhelming, but "how can they ignore. . ." , well it certainly can be ignored if it's thought to be bogus. And that concerns me. I just can't believe that someone isn't stuffing the ballot box with a voting program. Yes, we all love Lexie and many of us are voting for her multi[le times (including me). But near 90%? That's near impossible unless people at other schools just aren't voting at all, and I don't believe that -- until, perhaps, Lexie reached the point where her lead was so immense that supporters of other players reacted, why bother, it's rigged. I hope the vote being gamed by a voter-program by a Lexie supporter is not the case, but I think the odds are good that it is. And if so, as a strong supporter of Lexie, I think that's a shame. (BTW, I started this thread in hope of getting Stanford people to vote for Lexie, and it's working, but . . . is the vote legit? )
That near 90% is indeed overwhelming, but "how can they ignore. . ." , well it certainly can be ignored if it's thought to be bogus. And that concerns me. I just can't believe that someone isn't stuffing the ballot box with a voting program. Yes, we all love Lexie and many of us are voting for her multi[le times (including me). But near 90%? That's near impossible unless people at other schools just aren't voting at all, and I don't believe that -- until, perhaps, Lexie reached the point where her lead was so immense that supporters of other players reacted, why bother, it's rigged. I hope the vote being gamed by a voter-program by a Lexie supporter is not the case, but I think the odds are good that it is. And if so, as a strong supporter of Lexie, I think that's a shame. (BTW, I started this thread in hope of getting Stanford people to vote for Lexie, and it's working, but . . . is the vote legit? )
I, and I think a lot of other people, are voting 10-20 times for Lexie each time we log on. This reflects what I think the site intends, which is to get a measure of the passion of the candidates' supporters.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »