09-24-2022, 08:53 PM
And we are on the board! No shutout tonight.
Pax et Bonum
STANFORD VS UW GAME THREAD
09-24-2022, 09:00 PM
Ditch the slow RPO. We surprised SC with it, but with two OL out, McKee doesn't have any time after the mesh to do anything. It's not suited for what we have on the field.
Ditch the slow RPO. We surprised SC with it, but with two OL out, McKee doesn't have any time after the mesh to do anything. It's not suited for what we have on the field.
09-24-2022, 09:02 PM
(09-24-2022, 09:00 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: Ditch the slow RPO. We surprised SC with it, but with two OL out, McKee doesn't have any time after the mesh to do anything. It's not suited for what we have on the field.
And, we don't need it with our receivers, who can beat their defenders.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(09-24-2022, 09:00 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: Ditch the slow RPO. We surprised SC with it, but with two OL out, McKee doesn't have any time after the mesh to do anything. It's not suited for what we have on the field.
And, we don't need it with our receivers, who can beat their defenders.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-24-2022, 09:09 PM
(09-24-2022, 09:02 PM)martyup Wrote:(09-24-2022, 09:00 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: Ditch the slow RPO. We surprised SC with it, but with two OL out, McKee doesn't have any time after the mesh to do anything. It's not suited for what we have on the field.
And, we don't need it with our receivers, who can beat their defenders.
Exactly. Shaw was so taken with it, I doubt he gives it up. It will be a good test. I am definitely leaning toward joining the naysayers. Not sure if that's my problem or Shaw's.
(09-24-2022, 09:02 PM)martyup Wrote:(09-24-2022, 09:00 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: Ditch the slow RPO. We surprised SC with it, but with two OL out, McKee doesn't have any time after the mesh to do anything. It's not suited for what we have on the field.
And, we don't need it with our receivers, who can beat their defenders.
Exactly. Shaw was so taken with it, I doubt he gives it up. It will be a good test. I am definitely leaning toward joining the naysayers. Not sure if that's my problem or Shaw's.
09-24-2022, 09:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-24-2022, 09:14 PM by CardinalSagehen.)
We are down both of our starting tackles. As compared to the OL that we expected going into the season (including Bragg), we only have two of our five starting linemen. I don't think we'd be protecting McKee well enough anyway, but it's a big problem in this game and going forward.
Anyone see what happened to Rouse in the first quarter? All I saw was him pointing to his right shoulder area.
Also waiting to see whether McKee comes out in the second half. He was wincing pretty badly and three guys converged on his helmet. I think he will be fine, but with our luck, you never know....
Anyone see what happened to Rouse in the first quarter? All I saw was him pointing to his right shoulder area.
Also waiting to see whether McKee comes out in the second half. He was wincing pretty badly and three guys converged on his helmet. I think he will be fine, but with our luck, you never know....
(This post was last modified: 09-24-2022, 09:14 PM by CardinalSagehen.)
We are down both of our starting tackles. As compared to the OL that we expected going into the season (including Bragg), we only have two of our five starting linemen. I don't think we'd be protecting McKee well enough anyway, but it's a big problem in this game and going forward.
Anyone see what happened to Rouse in the first quarter? All I saw was him pointing to his right shoulder area.
Also waiting to see whether McKee comes out in the second half. He was wincing pretty badly and three guys converged on his helmet. I think he will be fine, but with our luck, you never know....
Anyone see what happened to Rouse in the first quarter? All I saw was him pointing to his right shoulder area.
Also waiting to see whether McKee comes out in the second half. He was wincing pretty badly and three guys converged on his helmet. I think he will be fine, but with our luck, you never know....
09-24-2022, 09:19 PM
1H Highlight.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/stanfordfball/status/1573883294927663105?s=46&t=objg49K1LVxc-AHVGs247w[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/stanfordfball/status/1573883294927663105?s=46&t=objg49K1LVxc-AHVGs247w[/tweet]
(09-24-2022, 09:12 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: We are down both of our starting tackles. As compared to the OL that we expected going into the season (including Bragg), we only have two of our five starting linemen.
But all I heard pre-season was how we were two-deep with quality at OL. I guess that was a bunch of bulls***
The SlowPO is our new wildcat
(09-24-2022, 09:12 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: We are down both of our starting tackles. As compared to the OL that we expected going into the season (including Bragg), we only have two of our five starting linemen.
But all I heard pre-season was how we were two-deep with quality at OL. I guess that was a bunch of bulls***
The SlowPO is our new wildcat
09-24-2022, 09:32 PM
Targeting. Ugh. Sure looked like it to me. Especially on replay. We dodged a bullet.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
Targeting. Ugh. Sure looked like it to me. Especially on replay. We dodged a bullet.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
09-24-2022, 09:41 PM
This is a predictably pathetic show by the Shaw offense. Another 3 and out. Enough to make one vomit!
09-24-2022, 09:42 PM
Toggling between our game and the Beavs. With 1:13 to play, Toejams take the lead 17-14. Unfortunate.
Pax et Bonum
Toggling between our game and the Beavs. With 1:13 to play, Toejams take the lead 17-14. Unfortunate.
Pax et Bonum
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia...ipo=images]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F1hMhlrWWfXU77iYnBB%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=7580bfeefb29bb6bfaa5eed01f3204d462679635b2493f311a8b6e1142b9b1c1&ipo=images)
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »