[81alum]

Morehouse was #4.  The not-crashing-the-boards is part of their unorthodox strategy.  That is why we had 19 second chance points to their 4, but they had 11 fast break points to our 6.

Their coach is very creative and it is intriguing how he has built such a competitive program around this weird style of play and short players.  30-3 and the second round of the NCAAs is nothing to sneeze at.  FGCU is a stronger program than many Pac-12 schools.  The FGCU site likes to brag that his winning percentage is higher than Geno's or Tara's--not mentioning (of course) the level of competition.  

So who was defending #4?

[81alum]

Morehouse was #4.  The not-crashing-the-boards is part of their unorthodox strategy.  That is why we had 19 second chance points to their 4, but they had 11 fast break points to our 6.

Their coach is very creative and it is intriguing how he has built such a competitive program around this weird style of play and short players.  30-3 and the second round of the NCAAs is nothing to sneeze at.  FGCU is a stronger program than many Pac-12 schools.  The FGCU site likes to brag that his winning percentage is higher than Geno's or Tara's--not mentioning (of course) the level of competition.  

So who was defending #4?