[cardfan77]

SF Chron sporting green already has an article -- nothing in it that hasn't been covered in the ESPN coverage, but still, here it is. And yes, ESPN is at least consistent -- the U Conn network

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/colle...count=Ng==

---

And here's ESPN (Creme) take on why Stanford is the #1 seed -- comes down to "body of work" -- but right now on ESPNU broadcast, Lobo says UConn should have been a #1, and Creme is picking Iowa to win the Seattle 2 bracket and go to the final four -- and UConn prevailing in Seattle 1, presumably over Virginia Tech

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-bask...-no-1-seed

Of course Lobo would say such thing. I get Iowa's claim to #1 seed and they should have been. But UConn as #1 seed is a joke. I'm rooting hard against UConn. The sooner they are out the better.

[cardfan77]

SF Chron sporting green already has an article -- nothing in it that hasn't been covered in the ESPN coverage, but still, here it is. And yes, ESPN is at least consistent -- the U Conn network

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/colle...count=Ng==

---

And here's ESPN (Creme) take on why Stanford is the #1 seed -- comes down to "body of work" -- but right now on ESPNU broadcast, Lobo says UConn should have been a #1, and Creme is picking Iowa to win the Seattle 2 bracket and go to the final four -- and UConn prevailing in Seattle 1, presumably over Virginia Tech

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-bask...-no-1-seed

Of course Lobo would say such thing. I get Iowa's claim to #1 seed and they should have been. But UConn as #1 seed is a joke. I'm rooting hard against UConn. The sooner they are out the better.