[Hieronymus]

Good article on the latest. It sounds like it hangs on a knife's edge. 

https://sports.yahoo.com/acc-expansion-o...06388.html

We need 12/15 votes. Reportedly there are 10 yea's, and 4-5 nay or undecideds. Per some forum posters claiming sources, (so large grains of salt)  FSU, Clemson, UNC, and UVA are currently Nos, with everyone else firm or leaning yes.

I can understand FSU and Clemson being opposed but why UVA and UNC? Do they see us competing for the same athletes given their strong academics?

It is intersetiing that 2 of the No’s are schools who are likely to flee. Shades of USC’s sabotage of the PAC.  But UNC and UVA are harder to figure for me.

[Hieronymus]

Good article on the latest. It sounds like it hangs on a knife's edge. 

https://sports.yahoo.com/acc-expansion-o...06388.html

We need 12/15 votes. Reportedly there are 10 yea's, and 4-5 nay or undecideds. Per some forum posters claiming sources, (so large grains of salt)  FSU, Clemson, UNC, and UVA are currently Nos, with everyone else firm or leaning yes.

I can understand FSU and Clemson being opposed but why UVA and UNC? Do they see us competing for the same athletes given their strong academics?

It is intersetiing that 2 of the No’s are schools who are likely to flee. Shades of USC’s sabotage of the PAC.  But UNC and UVA are harder to figure for me.