[msqueri]

People who aren’t incessantly thinking “fire Haase” are clueless. It only makes sense for .500 to elicit equal amounts of glass half full and glass half empty takes if one is ignorant to the nature of college basketball. Getting to .500 is not much of an achievement with the amount of dreck teams are able to pad their records against, and it is especially no achievement to hover around .500 for eight years. You won’t find another ostensibly major program in the country that goes eight years without being good and hasn’t made a change or two or three in that span. In any given year Haase teams being around .500 mean that we are the eighth or so best team in the Pac-12, which can fairly be argued as mediocre in that one given year, but being mediocre every year isn’t mediocre, it’s bad. Mediocre teams are occasionally good. Nobody who wants the best for Stanford basketball should watch it without thinking “fire Haase.”

[msqueri]

People who aren’t incessantly thinking “fire Haase” are clueless. It only makes sense for .500 to elicit equal amounts of glass half full and glass half empty takes if one is ignorant to the nature of college basketball. Getting to .500 is not much of an achievement with the amount of dreck teams are able to pad their records against, and it is especially no achievement to hover around .500 for eight years. You won’t find another ostensibly major program in the country that goes eight years without being good and hasn’t made a change or two or three in that span. In any given year Haase teams being around .500 mean that we are the eighth or so best team in the Pac-12, which can fairly be argued as mediocre in that one given year, but being mediocre every year isn’t mediocre, it’s bad. Mediocre teams are occasionally good. Nobody who wants the best for Stanford basketball should watch it without thinking “fire Haase.”