01-25-2024, 07:51 PM
(03-08-2022, 11:13 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(03-08-2022, 09:09 PM)teejers1 Wrote:(03-08-2022, 07:29 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Ultimately this is Yvonne’s call, but given the enormity of the situation, far be it for me to put the kibosh on the discussion, even though technically it is political.
If you are looking to a Stanford sports angle to it (aside from the analogies), there is this:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/looseshoulders/status/1497845117977182208?s=21[/tweet]
As for Putin, whether he wins or loses on the battlefield, he has already lost:
1) given Eastern European countries (plus Sweden and Finland) a strong rationale for joining NATO.
2) has exposed his army as a paper tiger
3) has done what US presidents going back three administrations have failed to do: get the European NATO allies to invest in defense
4) has convinced Europe to wean itself off Russian natural gas and will probably accelerate the transition from imported fossil fuels more generally
5) has devastated his country’s economy
6) has obliterated what was left of his reputation
It is heartbreaking that the Ukrainian people have suffered, and while I hope against hope that they repel the invaders, right now I am just praying that we can get to a cease fire to allow innocent civilians to evacuate.
BC
I'm not nearly as "optimistic" as you are regarding what this all has shown to date or what it will lead to in the future.
WAY too many wildcards, starting with the nut who invaded Ukraine - that's what a megalomaniac with absolute power (and no conscience) looks like. Scary and unpredictable.
I don’t disagree with your take at all. I think Putin has lost, but I don’t think that means that everything will turn out well for Western democracies. In the best case scenario, it has brought misery and destruction to the Ukrainian people, a refugee crisis of 2 million and counting, a potential food crisis in countries that depend on Russian and Ukrainian wheat, higher energy prices for everyone and the potential of having to restart coal plants to make up for reduced gas. And then there is the possibility of the conflict inadvertently widening, and even though I would consider this an unlikely event, that “megalomaniac with absolute power (and no conscience)” controls the world’s largest nuclear arsenal.
So, yeah, this qualifies as an L for everyone.
BC
An interesting article on Ukraine's drone attacks against Russian oil and gas industry.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambli...74ee632355
Makes one think about how many drones you can build for the price of one F16. The F16's are clearly needed, but the explosive growth of the drone segment of the Ukrainian military is significant. I would assume our military and that of our allies our paying attention to what is going on and what works and what doesn't.
