[Spiny_Norman]

Haase did a nice job with the high end recruits but given the difficulty of retaining such recruits for the long run that was overrated. His overall recruiting otherwise was not very good. I have data demonstrating this if folks are interested but the idea Haase was a great recruiter is an the exaggeration. And in addition to his median recruit/typical players being a bit below the Stanford norm, he struggled with retention.

Matt, who among the coaches DiBiaso, Davis, Johnson and Dawkins has been an above average recruiter? I exclude Montgomery from the comparison because we know he is the standard for all things Stanford basketball. Is anyone else even above average? Maybe it's hard to judge Johnson because his results are so skewed by the Lopi.

[Spiny_Norman]

Haase did a nice job with the high end recruits but given the difficulty of retaining such recruits for the long run that was overrated. His overall recruiting otherwise was not very good. I have data demonstrating this if folks are interested but the idea Haase was a great recruiter is an the exaggeration. And in addition to his median recruit/typical players being a bit below the Stanford norm, he struggled with retention.

Matt, who among the coaches DiBiaso, Davis, Johnson and Dawkins has been an above average recruiter? I exclude Montgomery from the comparison because we know he is the standard for all things Stanford basketball. Is anyone else even above average? Maybe it's hard to judge Johnson because his results are so skewed by the Lopi.