08-10-2024, 04:07 PM
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/10/ncaa-sp...ium=social
Good article about how the NCAA feeds the Olympics, with Stanford being mentioned, though the article incorrectly omits that the cuts were rescinded. But the point stands; Stanford, with the second most athletes on the games, and probably the most medals, was pretty close to cutting several sports a few years ago, and the financial situation is not going to get any better for the non-revenue sports. Last bullet:
I think this will probably be the high water mark for Stanford in the Olympics and perhaps for NCAA current and former athletes. I can easily imagine a few years from now, Team USA will suffer because of the profesionalization of collegiate athletics.
BC
Good article about how the NCAA feeds the Olympics, with Stanford being mentioned, though the article incorrectly omits that the cuts were rescinded. But the point stands; Stanford, with the second most athletes on the games, and probably the most medals, was pretty close to cutting several sports a few years ago, and the financial situation is not going to get any better for the non-revenue sports. Last bullet:
Quote: "So that's the one concern ... are there going to be sports being dropped?" Robinson said. "Because at the end of the day, the football dog must get fed."
I think this will probably be the high water mark for Stanford in the Olympics and perhaps for NCAA current and former athletes. I can easily imagine a few years from now, Team USA will suffer because of the profesionalization of collegiate athletics.
BC
