11-29-2024, 07:38 PM
What is there to say?
Nothing, really.
TT's job is safe, and Stanford football recedes further and further from anything that resembles fun and excitement. I am glad that the team played OK on the Big Game stage, but the win against Louisville was a true fluke and the victory over Syracuse wasn't much better. I respect TT as someone who is trying--I don't think that was true of Walt Harrs--but he is just not someone who can elevate a team by his leadership or offensive scheme, and while I believe he has belatedly recognized he importance of competent OL play, that doesn't mean he knows how to fix the problem.
Stanford will probably finish 3-9 again next year. Then we will see who might be interested in taking on this job after many, many years of neglect. It should be someone young with fresh ideas. December 2025 is when it will be worth talking about Stanford football again. See you on this board then, I hope.
Nothing, really.
TT's job is safe, and Stanford football recedes further and further from anything that resembles fun and excitement. I am glad that the team played OK on the Big Game stage, but the win against Louisville was a true fluke and the victory over Syracuse wasn't much better. I respect TT as someone who is trying--I don't think that was true of Walt Harrs--but he is just not someone who can elevate a team by his leadership or offensive scheme, and while I believe he has belatedly recognized he importance of competent OL play, that doesn't mean he knows how to fix the problem.
Stanford will probably finish 3-9 again next year. Then we will see who might be interested in taking on this job after many, many years of neglect. It should be someone young with fresh ideas. December 2025 is when it will be worth talking about Stanford football again. See you on this board then, I hope.