My son attended a high school in which two of his classmates (Kyle Olugbode and Kevin Danser) later played for Stanford, a linebacker (Michael Clay, now Phil. Eagles ST Coach) played for Oregon and their quarterback played for Wyoming. Their HS team played in the CA state open division championship twice in three years.
Their games were a lot of fun to watch, very high-level for high school football. The next year, my son was a freshman at a 1-AA college, so I thought I'd take in a game. I left after a quarter, it was very painful to watch. The QB's first pass was to an RB on a flat route. He threw a 15-yard pass about ten yards.
Just like Gulbranson did, multiple times.
I simply cannot believe that Stanford, a Power 4 ACC team, doesn't have a better quarterback. The current QB resembles a not-very-good 1-AA quarterback. I realize that two former NFL QBs are in charge of this team (directly and indirectly) but is the cupboard really that bare?
Their games were a lot of fun to watch, very high-level for high school football. The next year, my son was a freshman at a 1-AA college, so I thought I'd take in a game. I left after a quarter, it was very painful to watch. The QB's first pass was to an RB on a flat route. He threw a 15-yard pass about ten yards.
Just like Gulbranson did, multiple times.
I simply cannot believe that Stanford, a Power 4 ACC team, doesn't have a better quarterback. The current QB resembles a not-very-good 1-AA quarterback. I realize that two former NFL QBs are in charge of this team (directly and indirectly) but is the cupboard really that bare?
Audaces fortuna iuvat