[BostonCard]

Stanford wins in 3.  25-20, 25-16, 25-18.
Side-out percentage of almost 80%.  (I'll take 13 service errors to be at 80%)

The team hit 0.422.  Sayer 0.700, Andrew 0.562,  Blyashov 0.382, Jordan & Parks 0.375.
Interestingly, Rubin had the lowest hitting percentage at 0.214.

More importantly, what was Texas Tech’s side out percentage.  Given that we had several serving runs, it was probably pretty low, in which case we were serving well despite the serving errors and only 1 ace. I recall lots of out of system plays and several free balls, so mission accomplished.

The reason that a high so percentage for us is good is that the consequences of a service error are minimal.  Yeah, we lose the point, but have a high chance of getting it back right after.

BC

[BostonCard]

Stanford wins in 3.  25-20, 25-16, 25-18.
Side-out percentage of almost 80%.  (I'll take 13 service errors to be at 80%)

The team hit 0.422.  Sayer 0.700, Andrew 0.562,  Blyashov 0.382, Jordan & Parks 0.375.
Interestingly, Rubin had the lowest hitting percentage at 0.214.

More importantly, what was Texas Tech’s side out percentage.  Given that we had several serving runs, it was probably pretty low, in which case we were serving well despite the serving errors and only 1 ace. I recall lots of out of system plays and several free balls, so mission accomplished.

The reason that a high so percentage for us is good is that the consequences of a service error are minimal.  Yeah, we lose the point, but have a high chance of getting it back right after.

BC