[paloalto]

Thanks for all the detailed and knowledgeable comments on this page.  It's a rarity for this thread.  

That's a good presentation of the stats BC.  A hitting percentage of .166 versus .273 is a massive difference.  .166 is bad.  .273 is good.  However, based on the eye test I'm not satisfied with Kurt or Blyashov.  For next year I'm praying for a transfer OH although the probability is near zero.  Demaria is not the answer either.  I've seen her play many times in club last season and she's not as good as Kurt or Blyashov.  

Parks was very highly ranked coming out of high school.  Before the season Hambly said Parks has to be on the court because she is so good.  Way too much hype which I believed at first.  Unfortunately Parks at this point is a mediocre setter.  I like her but I have to be  objective.

Having said that I expect Stanford to win the remainder of its home games with the possible exception of Pitt.

[paloalto]

Thanks for all the detailed and knowledgeable comments on this page.  It's a rarity for this thread.  

That's a good presentation of the stats BC.  A hitting percentage of .166 versus .273 is a massive difference.  .166 is bad.  .273 is good.  However, based on the eye test I'm not satisfied with Kurt or Blyashov.  For next year I'm praying for a transfer OH although the probability is near zero.  Demaria is not the answer either.  I've seen her play many times in club last season and she's not as good as Kurt or Blyashov.  

Parks was very highly ranked coming out of high school.  Before the season Hambly said Parks has to be on the court because she is so good.  Way too much hype which I believed at first.  Unfortunately Parks at this point is a mediocre setter.  I like her but I have to be  objective.

Having said that I expect Stanford to win the remainder of its home games with the possible exception of Pitt.