(07-09-2019, 07:20 AM)81alum Wrote: The fact that 3/4 of the departing Oregon players would not have contributed very much simply raises my suspicions more about the circumstances of their departure. I've been a long time advocate of four year scholarships for this very reason.
Unfortunately, the four year guaranteed scholarship as currently operated doesn't do much to address this situation. College coaches have an array of levers to make kids "voluntarily" decide to give up their scholarships, mostly to transfer but sometimes just to quit. The guaranteed scholarship ends under that situation.
Personally, in head-count sports, I would like to see that once any scholarship starts it cannot be awarded to another player for four years (or pro-rated if the scholarship is given to a non-frosh). That would entirely switch the motivation for coaches, which would now be to keep the kid in the program.
It's possible that's too far, I haven't thought through all the consequences, but it would take something like that to stop the various forms of running less productive kids off.
[And in no way do I know that is what happened at Oregon. This was a general comment, not specific to their case. ]