04-26-2020, 05:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-26-2020, 06:09 AM by JustAnotherFan.)
It seems to me that the anti-vaxx movement has gained some considerable momentum in recent years, particularly in the far right, libertarian, and progressive circles. But it is the more progressive (often affluent) areas that seem to have the most concentrated anti-vaxx sentiment. Manhattan and rich suburbs of NYC, Seattle, Portland, Austin, Asheville (NC), and I believe the Bay Area, as well.
Considering that the focus tends to be on children's vaccination schedules (although a non-trivial amount of browbeating by antivaxxers comes via the annual flu vaccine) I don't think that there has been enough scrutiny on what this movement's effect will be on people getting the pandemic vaccine if one becomes available.
Questions for you all, do you believe this movement will inhibit the adoption of the potential vaccine in a way (either by sheer numbers or by changing public perception of the safety) that undermines public health? Do you believe that government mandates will further strengthen the movement in a way that makes adoption more difficult? Will the general geographic overlap (metro areas) of the hotspots for the disease and of the antivaxx communities compel the antivaxx community to move more aggressively toward taking the potential vaccine or will it only exacerbate the problem?
This has been in the back of my mind the past couple of days and I'd love to hear what others on this board have to think about it. A quick internet search brings up multiple articles but I haven't seen the conversation on this forum.
Follow up question, will people be more or likely to get the flu vaccine this year given that could have a significant impact on our ability to deal with a second wave of COVID-19 cases this coming fall/winter?
Some humor: https://www.medpagetoday.com/blogs/gomer/85708
Considering that the focus tends to be on children's vaccination schedules (although a non-trivial amount of browbeating by antivaxxers comes via the annual flu vaccine) I don't think that there has been enough scrutiny on what this movement's effect will be on people getting the pandemic vaccine if one becomes available.
Questions for you all, do you believe this movement will inhibit the adoption of the potential vaccine in a way (either by sheer numbers or by changing public perception of the safety) that undermines public health? Do you believe that government mandates will further strengthen the movement in a way that makes adoption more difficult? Will the general geographic overlap (metro areas) of the hotspots for the disease and of the antivaxx communities compel the antivaxx community to move more aggressively toward taking the potential vaccine or will it only exacerbate the problem?
This has been in the back of my mind the past couple of days and I'd love to hear what others on this board have to think about it. A quick internet search brings up multiple articles but I haven't seen the conversation on this forum.
Follow up question, will people be more or likely to get the flu vaccine this year given that could have a significant impact on our ability to deal with a second wave of COVID-19 cases this coming fall/winter?
Some humor: https://www.medpagetoday.com/blogs/gomer/85708

