09-08-2021, 11:07 AM
(09-08-2021, 09:56 AM)teejers1 Wrote: And I'm not arguing that McGee isn't a good value at his salary, just that he doesn't exude lockdown closer stuff.
Who does currently exude lockdown closer stuff? Perhaps others fit the "dominant closer" profile better, but I just don't think you can name more than five closers who have pitched more effectively this year. Substance over style.
I agree that the two metrics that Lex referenced (WHIP and K/BB ratio) are good measures of closer effectiveness.
Who is SF battling down the stretch and possibly will face in the NL playoffs?
LA: Kenley Jansen (1.17 WHIP, 2.0 K/BB)
SD: Mark Melancon (1.17 WHIP, 2.3 K/BB)
Mil: Josh Hader (0.80 WHIP, 15.5 K/BB)
Cin: Mychal Givens (1.33 WHIP, 2.1 K/BB)
Atl: Will Smith (1.16 WHIP, 3.3 K/BB)
Phl: Ian Kennedy (1.08 WHIP, 4.3 K/BB)
NYM: Edwin Diaz (1.15 WHIP, 3.3 K/BB)
McGee has a 0.92 WHIP with a 5.8 K/BB ratio.
It's true that he doesn't exude elite, dominant shutdown stuff, but his results this season are very strong. Posters are calling for a lockdown closer like Mariano Rivera (greatest ever) and comparing McGee unfavorably to Hader (in a class of his own currently). Fair enough, but more realistically he's been more valuable than all but a handful of MLB closers, and the presence of Rogers makes the SF bullpen an even bigger strength.
SF's key rival (LA) certainly has a closer who exudes an intimidating, shutdown presence, but he's been highly inconsistent, much to the consternation of Dodgers fans. Does he inspire more confidence than the McGee/Rogers tandem?
If I didn't have access to the actual standings I would have guessed that the Giants are playing out the string at under .500 since they are a collection of old, tiring position players who are horrible situational hitters, lucky starters, and merely solid relievers who don't exude closer attributes.
