I'm inclined to think that the criticism of our pre-season schedule is predicated on the belief that the Pac 12 is weak this year (and thus we especially need the preseason to build our resume.) The only other PAC 12 teams besides Stanford listed in the preseason top-25 are 19 Arizona and 20 Oregon.
Frankly, I don't think anyone has any genuine idea about the quality of these sorts of unstable musical-chair teams with gargantuan numbers of transfers in and out. The Pac 12 could have multiple sweet 16 teams or it might have only one. Come tournament time, these sorts of discussions are going to look silly. Teams "everyone" thinks will be spectacular now could be mediocre by then, and there will be teams not on the radar now that will excel. The field in WBB has become deeper in recent years, and the influence of the transfer rules will further scramble these sorts of calculations. We have moved from reading the tea leaves to consulting the ouija board.
Frankly, I don't think anyone has any genuine idea about the quality of these sorts of unstable musical-chair teams with gargantuan numbers of transfers in and out. The Pac 12 could have multiple sweet 16 teams or it might have only one. Come tournament time, these sorts of discussions are going to look silly. Teams "everyone" thinks will be spectacular now could be mediocre by then, and there will be teams not on the radar now that will excel. The field in WBB has become deeper in recent years, and the influence of the transfer rules will further scramble these sorts of calculations. We have moved from reading the tea leaves to consulting the ouija board.

