[CompSci87]

I have been posting a chart like this for WBB for a while and with the new roster limits going into effect next year I can now do this more easily for WVB.

WVB roster by year
as of Nov 15, 2024



Click here to resize in a new tab  ...

https://i.ibb.co/K2CbqY8/WVB-Nov15.jpg

With new rules going into effect next year the roster limit will be 19 with no walk-ons above that allowed.

Thanks for this! But you missed carrying the 2025-26 freshmen forward as sophomores and juniors the next two years.

[CompSci87]

I have been posting a chart like this for WBB for a while and with the new roster limits going into effect next year I can now do this more easily for WVB.

WVB roster by year
as of Nov 15, 2024



Click here to resize in a new tab  ...

https://i.ibb.co/K2CbqY8/WVB-Nov15.jpg

With new rules going into effect next year the roster limit will be 19 with no walk-ons above that allowed.

Thanks for this! But you missed carrying the 2025-26 freshmen forward as sophomores and juniors the next two years.

[johnbar]

Not a recording error. I noticed her because of her ponytail on the 12-14 point and again at 13-15. I went back in the video to confirm it. 

In the broadcast, there is a delay before the 2nd serve and the Virginia score on the video drops back to 14 and then returns to 15. 

My guess, without checking the rules, is that out of rotation can only cause a loss of the current point. Once the next point starts, the score isn’t changed. I may go back and figure out when they got out of rotation.

Thanks!

Oh, I do remember seeing that flip-flop with the score.

A rotation error can cause the loss of more than one point, because I've seen it happen.  A player served out of turn; her team won the point. Same player served again, they won another point.  Then the mistake was caught.  They lost both points.  That was a single service run, and the team making the mistake initally won the points.  

In this case, the opposing team (Stanford) served in between - not sure if that matters, but it might. And Stanford won both points.

[johnbar]

Not a recording error. I noticed her because of her ponytail on the 12-14 point and again at 13-15. I went back in the video to confirm it. 

In the broadcast, there is a delay before the 2nd serve and the Virginia score on the video drops back to 14 and then returns to 15. 

My guess, without checking the rules, is that out of rotation can only cause a loss of the current point. Once the next point starts, the score isn’t changed. I may go back and figure out when they got out of rotation.

Thanks!

Oh, I do remember seeing that flip-flop with the score.

A rotation error can cause the loss of more than one point, because I've seen it happen.  A player served out of turn; her team won the point. Same player served again, they won another point.  Then the mistake was caught.  They lost both points.  That was a single service run, and the team making the mistake initally won the points.  

In this case, the opposing team (Stanford) served in between - not sure if that matters, but it might. And Stanford won both points.

[BostonCard]

I have been posting a chart like this for WBB for a while and with the new roster limits going into effect next year I can now do this more easily for WVB.

WVB roster by year
as of Nov 15, 2024



Click here to resize in a new tab  ...

https://i.ibb.co/tHq1jkk/WVB-Nov15.jpg

With new rules going into effect next year the roster limit will be 19 with no walk-ons above that allowed.

(Whoops!  Thanks, CompSci!)

Also, Blyashov is redshirting this year, so she will remain a (RS) sophomore by eligibility.

BC

---

Oh, I do remember seeing that flip-flop with the score.

A rotation error can cause the loss of more than one point, because I've seen it happen.  A player served out of turn; her team won the point. Same player served again, they won another point.  Then the mistake was caught.  They lost both points.  That was a single service run, and the team making the mistake initally won the points.  

In this case, the opposing team (Stanford) served in between - not sure if that matters, but it might. And Stanford won both points.

Thanks.  Quick question... if a server wins more than one point before being identified as being out of rotation, do all the points go to the other team or are all the points revoked and one point goes to the opponent (the side out), while the rest of the points would be null since the wrong team was serving.

You could imagine a situation where an astute coach realizes that the wrong player is serving for the opponent and instructs their own team to purposefully lose points a bunch of points before challenging that the player is out of rotation.

BC

[BostonCard]

I have been posting a chart like this for WBB for a while and with the new roster limits going into effect next year I can now do this more easily for WVB.

WVB roster by year
as of Nov 15, 2024



Click here to resize in a new tab  ...

https://i.ibb.co/tHq1jkk/WVB-Nov15.jpg

With new rules going into effect next year the roster limit will be 19 with no walk-ons above that allowed.

(Whoops!  Thanks, CompSci!)

Also, Blyashov is redshirting this year, so she will remain a (RS) sophomore by eligibility.

BC

---

Oh, I do remember seeing that flip-flop with the score.

A rotation error can cause the loss of more than one point, because I've seen it happen.  A player served out of turn; her team won the point. Same player served again, they won another point.  Then the mistake was caught.  They lost both points.  That was a single service run, and the team making the mistake initally won the points.  

In this case, the opposing team (Stanford) served in between - not sure if that matters, but it might. And Stanford won both points.

Thanks.  Quick question... if a server wins more than one point before being identified as being out of rotation, do all the points go to the other team or are all the points revoked and one point goes to the opponent (the side out), while the rest of the points would be null since the wrong team was serving.

You could imagine a situation where an astute coach realizes that the wrong player is serving for the opponent and instructs their own team to purposefully lose points a bunch of points before challenging that the player is out of rotation.

BC

[paloalto]

Virginia Tech at Stanford tonight 7:00pm PT on ACCNX.  Tech is 1-14 in conference.  They got swept by Cal last night.

Brief highlights of Harvey from last night.  She has an amazing vertical jump.  I hope Harvey continues to play with confidence.

https://twitter.com/StanfordWVB/status/1...1065189760

[paloalto]

Virginia Tech at Stanford tonight 7:00pm PT on ACCNX.  Tech is 1-14 in conference.  They got swept by Cal last night.

Brief highlights of Harvey from last night.  She has an amazing vertical jump.  I hope Harvey continues to play with confidence.

https://twitter.com/StanfordWVB/status/1...1065189760

[paloalto]

I keep finding things I don't like about the ACC.  The "Stanford" announcer on ACCNx welcomed everyone to "another late night game".  Uh, since when is 7PM late night?   Can't get the East Coast bias out of the ACC....,

You get upset by the most trivial things.  Don't sweat the small stuff.  The announcer provided information equally about both teams and coaches.

---

Stanford vs Virginia Tech; things going as expected so far in first set.

[paloalto]

I keep finding things I don't like about the ACC.  The "Stanford" announcer on ACCNx welcomed everyone to "another late night game".  Uh, since when is 7PM late night?   Can't get the East Coast bias out of the ACC....,

You get upset by the most trivial things.  Don't sweat the small stuff.  The announcer provided information equally about both teams and coaches.

---

Stanford vs Virginia Tech; things going as expected so far in first set.

[SkiBum80]

Up 13-6 in first set
Great serving with 3 aces & no errors so far

[SkiBum80]

Up 13-6 in first set
Great serving with 3 aces & no errors so far

[paloalto]

At the moment this match is looking like it will be boring for anyone other than Stanford fans.

[paloalto]

At the moment this match is looking like it will be boring for anyone other than Stanford fans.

[BostonCard]

At 23-7, Stanford has a 100% side-out percentage.  That's to say, Virginia Tech has not won any points on its own serve.  Also, we have 0 attack errors.

BC

[BostonCard]

At 23-7, Stanford has a 100% side-out percentage.  That's to say, Virginia Tech has not won any points on its own serve.  Also, we have 0 attack errors.

BC

[SkiBum80]

Sami Francis is everywhere

[SkiBum80]

Sami Francis is everywhere

[BostonCard]

And, I didn't jinx things; we finish the first set with a 100% side-out percentage and no attack errors.  In fact, other than Jordyn Harvey's service error at 24-7, we had no errors whatsoever; no attack errors, no receive errors, and no block errors.

BC

[BostonCard]

And, I didn't jinx things; we finish the first set with a 100% side-out percentage and no attack errors.  In fact, other than Jordyn Harvey's service error at 24-7, we had no errors whatsoever; no attack errors, no receive errors, and no block errors.

BC

[paloalto]

Stat builder for Francis.   Nice serving run by Harvey.

[paloalto]

Stat builder for Francis.   Nice serving run by Harvey.

[BostonCard]

Not good to put up a single blocker against Kurt.  This is where Miner's threat to go over on two can really help the team (that being said, not a great play by the VaTech MB).

https://x.com/StanfordWVB/status/1857624133598691468

BC

[BostonCard]

Not good to put up a single blocker against Kurt.  This is where Miner's threat to go over on two can really help the team (that being said, not a great play by the VaTech MB).

https://x.com/StanfordWVB/status/1857624133598691468

BC

[SkiBum80]

Announcer: Ipar Kurt makes it hurt!

[SkiBum80]

Announcer: Ipar Kurt makes it hurt!

[cardfan77]

Announcer: Ipar Kurt makes it hurt!

Haha.. that’s her favorite line

[cardfan77]

Announcer: Ipar Kurt makes it hurt!

Haha.. that’s her favorite line

[BostonCard]

Announcer: Ipar Kurt makes it hurt!

My other favorite: Kami to Sami.

BC

[BostonCard]

Announcer: Ipar Kurt makes it hurt!

My other favorite: Kami to Sami.

BC

[paloalto]

Not good to put up a single blocker against Kurt.  This is where Miner's threat to go over on two can really help the team (that being said, not a great play by the VaTech MB).

https://x.com/StanfordWVB/status/1857624133598691468

BC

Miner's deceptive setting combined with Tech MB forced to focus on Francis.

[paloalto]

Not good to put up a single blocker against Kurt.  This is where Miner's threat to go over on two can really help the team (that being said, not a great play by the VaTech MB).

https://x.com/StanfordWVB/status/1857624133598691468

BC

Miner's deceptive setting combined with Tech MB forced to focus on Francis.

[SkiBum80]

Hokies naggily hanging around

---

A good run to pull away would be nice right now

---

I haven’t heard: Elia is hellia

[SkiBum80]

Hokies naggily hanging around

---

A good run to pull away would be nice right now

---

I haven’t heard: Elia is hellia

[CompSci87]

I had a new experience: when I came in an usher told me "Nobody will be coming, so sit anywhere you want." Maybe that was just because I'm on crutches.

[CompSci87]

I had a new experience: when I came in an usher told me "Nobody will be coming, so sit anywhere you want." Maybe that was just because I'm on crutches.

[paloalto]

Score closer in set two so far.

[paloalto]

Score closer in set two so far.

[BobK]

Va tech has 19 players 2 leave but they have 4 recruits. So have to cut 3? Texas has 23 Interesting dilemma for teams

[BobK]

Va tech has 19 players 2 leave but they have 4 recruits. So have to cut 3? Texas has 23 Interesting dilemma for teams