03-17-2025, 05:09 PM
Yes, thanks for checking out the podcast to find out what Cam was really saying. Even from what was in the article I had a strong sense her remarks were being misquoted or misunderstood.
(03-31-2025, 08:28 PM)PVTree Wrote: Kiki ending her collegiate career with 2 below par performances. Juju's injury derailed her chance at being a national champion.
Agnes played very well for TCU (rebound beast), but it wasn't enough to beat Texas.
Out of the remaining teams, I have to go with SoCar, Texas, Yukon, and Traitorville as the least appealing.
*Yes, I will always consider Betts a traitor, and the initiator of our (temporary?) downfall. IMO, she stays, Kiki stays, we get Sienna, and we roll along with the other elites this year.*
(03-31-2025, 08:28 PM)PVTree Wrote: Kiki ending her collegiate career with 2 below par performances. Juju's injury derailed her chance at being a national champion.
Agnes played very well for TCU (rebound beast), but it wasn't enough to beat Texas.
Out of the remaining teams, I have to go with SoCar, Texas, Yukon, and Traitorville as the least appealing.
*Yes, I will always consider Betts a traitor, and the initiator of our (temporary?) downfall. IMO, she stays, Kiki stays, we get Sienna, and we roll along with the other elites this year.*
(04-01-2025, 07:44 AM)BobK Wrote: Agnes graduated in three years. It’s hard to get into Stanford grad schools.
Not a domino
(04-01-2025, 07:44 AM)BobK Wrote: Agnes graduated in three years. It’s hard to get into Stanford grad schools.
Not a domino
(04-01-2025, 07:44 AM)BobK Wrote: Agnes graduated in three years. It’s hard to get into Stanford grad schools.
Not a domino
(04-01-2025, 07:44 AM)BobK Wrote: Agnes graduated in three years. It’s hard to get into Stanford grad schools.
Not a domino
(04-04-2025, 08:28 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: Obviously UConn is incredibly talented with a Big 3 of Bueckers, Fudd, and Strong. But the style and way they play is fun as hell to watch. Pace is so fast, great cutting, moment, the offensive is so crisp. They turn teams over. We should strive to emulate a lot of these concepts in our own style of play.
A very anticlimactic ending to UCLAs great season. An embarrassing performance on the biggest stage. UCLA was outmatched from the start. Bueckers even had a very average game. Betts in tears on the bench. If you compare roster to roster, UCLA probably has just as much talent as UConn but you’d never know that watching the game.
(04-04-2025, 08:28 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: Obviously UConn is incredibly talented with a Big 3 of Bueckers, Fudd, and Strong. But the style and way they play is fun as hell to watch. Pace is so fast, great cutting, moment, the offensive is so crisp. They turn teams over. We should strive to emulate a lot of these concepts in our own style of play.
A very anticlimactic ending to UCLAs great season. An embarrassing performance on the biggest stage. UCLA was outmatched from the start. Bueckers even had a very average game. Betts in tears on the bench. If you compare roster to roster, UCLA probably has just as much talent as UConn but you’d never know that watching the game.
(04-04-2025, 08:45 PM)BosCard Wrote: I(04-04-2025, 08:28 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: Obviously UConn is incredibly talented with a Big 3 of Bueckers, Fudd, and Strong. But the style and way they play is fun as hell to watch. Pace is so fast, great cutting, moment, the offensive is so crisp. They turn teams over. We should strive to emulate a lot of these concepts in our own style of play.
A very anticlimactic ending to UCLAs great season. An embarrassing performance on the biggest stage. UCLA was outmatched from the start. Bueckers even had a very average game. Betts in tears on the bench. If you compare roster to roster, UCLA probably has just as much talent as UConn but you’d never know that watching the game.
Embarrassing loss for UCLA which was the #1 overall seed. Even though I hate UConn, I’m not mad at the outcome because I’m not rooting for players who left our program.
(04-04-2025, 08:45 PM)BosCard Wrote: I(04-04-2025, 08:28 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: Obviously UConn is incredibly talented with a Big 3 of Bueckers, Fudd, and Strong. But the style and way they play is fun as hell to watch. Pace is so fast, great cutting, moment, the offensive is so crisp. They turn teams over. We should strive to emulate a lot of these concepts in our own style of play.
A very anticlimactic ending to UCLAs great season. An embarrassing performance on the biggest stage. UCLA was outmatched from the start. Bueckers even had a very average game. Betts in tears on the bench. If you compare roster to roster, UCLA probably has just as much talent as UConn but you’d never know that watching the game.
Embarrassing loss for UCLA which was the #1 overall seed. Even though I hate UConn, I’m not mad at the outcome because I’m not rooting for players who left our program.
(04-05-2025, 09:40 AM)jonnyss Wrote: yes, the uconn offense was fun to watch, especially on fast breaks. bueckers and fudd graduate, but sarah strong is already excellent and will be only a rising sophomore.
but it's the uconn defense that was dominant. rapid, unpredictable switching from player-to-player to zone. doubling betts down low, then anticipating her pass to the wing and racing out before ucla could get off a 3. ucla had almost no open shots, and they couldn't hit the few they had. neither jones nor rice could get free. jones in particular looked useless on offense. gardiner and dugalic threw up wild shots before getting set. so many air balls! frankly, ucla looked like us this year against good teams.
(04-05-2025, 09:40 AM)jonnyss Wrote: yes, the uconn offense was fun to watch, especially on fast breaks. bueckers and fudd graduate, but sarah strong is already excellent and will be only a rising sophomore.
but it's the uconn defense that was dominant. rapid, unpredictable switching from player-to-player to zone. doubling betts down low, then anticipating her pass to the wing and racing out before ucla could get off a 3. ucla had almost no open shots, and they couldn't hit the few they had. neither jones nor rice could get free. jones in particular looked useless on offense. gardiner and dugalic threw up wild shots before getting set. so many air balls! frankly, ucla looked like us this year against good teams.
(04-05-2025, 11:08 AM)Maple Leaf Wrote:(04-05-2025, 09:40 AM)jonnyss Wrote: yes, the uconn offense was fun to watch, especially on fast breaks. bueckers and fudd graduate, but sarah strong is already excellent and will be only a rising sophomore.
but it's the uconn defense that was dominant. rapid, unpredictable switching from player-to-player to zone. doubling betts down low, then anticipating her pass to the wing and racing out before ucla could get off a 3. ucla had almost no open shots, and they couldn't hit the few they had. neither jones nor rice could get free. jones in particular looked useless on offense. gardiner and dugalic threw up wild shots before getting set. so many air balls! frankly, ucla looked like us this year against good teams.
Agree with you on uconn's defense, but they generally have excellent defenses especially at this time of year. Their offense ran, ran and ran, they ran ucla into the hardood. uconn's coaching was outstanding, ucla coaching was seemed totally unprepared and failed to make any adjustments. ucla can recruit players, but it seems over the years the player development and the team play has lagged behind the talent level assembled.
(04-05-2025, 11:08 AM)Maple Leaf Wrote:(04-05-2025, 09:40 AM)jonnyss Wrote: yes, the uconn offense was fun to watch, especially on fast breaks. bueckers and fudd graduate, but sarah strong is already excellent and will be only a rising sophomore.
but it's the uconn defense that was dominant. rapid, unpredictable switching from player-to-player to zone. doubling betts down low, then anticipating her pass to the wing and racing out before ucla could get off a 3. ucla had almost no open shots, and they couldn't hit the few they had. neither jones nor rice could get free. jones in particular looked useless on offense. gardiner and dugalic threw up wild shots before getting set. so many air balls! frankly, ucla looked like us this year against good teams.
Agree with you on uconn's defense, but they generally have excellent defenses especially at this time of year. Their offense ran, ran and ran, they ran ucla into the hardood. uconn's coaching was outstanding, ucla coaching was seemed totally unprepared and failed to make any adjustments. ucla can recruit players, but it seems over the years the player development and the team play has lagged behind the talent level assembled.
(04-05-2025, 09:40 AM)jonnyss Wrote: yes, the uconn offense was fun to watch, especially on fast breaks. bueckers and fudd graduate, but sarah strong is already excellent and will be only a rising sophomore.
but it's the uconn defense that was dominant. rapid, unpredictable switching from player-to-player to zone. doubling betts down low, then anticipating her pass to the wing and racing out before ucla could get off a 3. ucla had almost no open shots, and they couldn't hit the few they had. neither jones nor rice could get free. jones in particular looked useless on offense. gardiner and dugalic threw up wild shots before getting set. so many air balls! frankly, ucla looked like us this year against good teams.
(04-05-2025, 09:40 AM)jonnyss Wrote: yes, the uconn offense was fun to watch, especially on fast breaks. bueckers and fudd graduate, but sarah strong is already excellent and will be only a rising sophomore.
but it's the uconn defense that was dominant. rapid, unpredictable switching from player-to-player to zone. doubling betts down low, then anticipating her pass to the wing and racing out before ucla could get off a 3. ucla had almost no open shots, and they couldn't hit the few they had. neither jones nor rice could get free. jones in particular looked useless on offense. gardiner and dugalic threw up wild shots before getting set. so many air balls! frankly, ucla looked like us this year against good teams.