05-16-2025, 03:38 PM
Wow, that forehand did not miss by much
Men's Tennis - spring 2025
That was the most nerve-wrecking matchup where we were up 3-0 that I've seen and it came down to a 3rd set tiebreak.
Great for Max to gut it out, especially after making a few unforced when he had the opportunity to break at 5-5. Great goldfish memory to perservere.
And they have to come back tomorrow and do it all over again versus Wake.
Great for Max to gut it out, especially after making a few unforced when he had the opportunity to break at 5-5. Great goldfish memory to perservere.
And they have to come back tomorrow and do it all over again versus Wake.
(This post was last modified: 05-16-2025, 03:42 PM by TheFarm07.)
That was the most nerve-wrecking matchup where we were up 3-0 that I've seen and it came down to a 3rd set tiebreak.
Great for Max to gut it out, especially after making a few unforced when he had the opportunity to break at 5-5. Great goldfish memory to perservere.
And they have to come back tomorrow and do it all over again versus Wake.
Great for Max to gut it out, especially after making a few unforced when he had the opportunity to break at 5-5. Great goldfish memory to perservere.
And they have to come back tomorrow and do it all over again versus Wake.
05-16-2025, 03:41 PM
The winning point. Basing is on the far court in white.
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
The winning point. Basing is on the far court in white.
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
05-16-2025, 04:06 PM
(05-16-2025, 03:41 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: The winning point. Basing is on the far court in white.
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
The last shot is close, but I think clearly out.
(05-16-2025, 03:41 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: The winning point. Basing is on the far court in white.
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
The last shot is close, but I think clearly out.
(05-16-2025, 04:06 PM)Jamesy Wrote:(05-16-2025, 03:41 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: The winning point. Basing is on the far court in white.
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
The last shot is close, but I think clearly out.
With the line technology being prevalent on the pro tour (I'm not sure how expensive it would be), I think they should invest in it somewhere.
Also, I always wonder, why aren't the NCAA championships played at the USTA Center in Flushing (where the US Open is played)? I know it's not the college tennis setup with adjoining courts but playing at the high-numbered adjacent courts would be similar and that technology is there for line calls.
Or if not the USTA Center, one of the other sites where a major U.S. pro tournament is played (Indian Wells, Miami, Cincinnati, etc.), are those sites so booked up the other 50 weeks of the season when the tournament is not being held?
(This post was last modified: 05-16-2025, 04:15 PM by TheFarm07.)
(05-16-2025, 04:06 PM)Jamesy Wrote:(05-16-2025, 03:41 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: The winning point. Basing is on the far court in white.
https://x.com/StanfordTennis/status/1923508747906712051
The last shot is close, but I think clearly out.
With the line technology being prevalent on the pro tour (I'm not sure how expensive it would be), I think they should invest in it somewhere.
Also, I always wonder, why aren't the NCAA championships played at the USTA Center in Flushing (where the US Open is played)? I know it's not the college tennis setup with adjoining courts but playing at the high-numbered adjacent courts would be similar and that technology is there for line calls.
Or if not the USTA Center, one of the other sites where a major U.S. pro tournament is played (Indian Wells, Miami, Cincinnati, etc.), are those sites so booked up the other 50 weeks of the season when the tournament is not being held?
05-16-2025, 05:12 PM
If I'm not mistaken, the NCAA championship will be played in the USTA Center after next year. It will be there for 10 years.
05-16-2025, 05:30 PM
Semifinals tomorrow vs. Wake at 1 pm pacific
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
Semifinals tomorrow vs. Wake at 1 pm pacific
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
05-16-2025, 06:21 PM
(05-16-2025, 05:47 PM)TooMuchTV Wrote:(05-16-2025, 05:30 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: Semifinals tomorrow vs. Wake at 1 pm pacific
2 pm according to gostanford.com.
I saw 1 pm on X. But I see on NCAA.com that it is 2 pm pacific. That would seem to be official.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
(05-16-2025, 05:47 PM)TooMuchTV Wrote:(05-16-2025, 05:30 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: Semifinals tomorrow vs. Wake at 1 pm pacific
2 pm according to gostanford.com.
I saw 1 pm on X. But I see on NCAA.com that it is 2 pm pacific. That would seem to be official.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
05-17-2025, 03:53 PM
Semifinal match was delayed by lightning, now being moved indoors. Start time set for 4:15 pacific.
Live scoring - https://ioncourt.com/ties/68289f74b4050de812560f68
Live scoring - https://ioncourt.com/ties/68289f74b4050de812560f68
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
Semifinal match was delayed by lightning, now being moved indoors. Start time set for 4:15 pacific.
Live scoring - https://ioncourt.com/ties/68289f74b4050de812560f68
Live scoring - https://ioncourt.com/ties/68289f74b4050de812560f68
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
05-17-2025, 06:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-17-2025, 06:24 PM by BostonCard.)
Not looking good. We lost the doubles point, and are down a set in 2, 5, and 6. We won the first set at 1 and 4, and are in a tiebreaker at the 3s.
BC
Looking very not good. Goodsick and Razeghi fell in straight sets at 5 and 6, respectively, and Stanford is down 3-0.
BC
Von Der Schulenburg won at #4, so it is now 1-3. On the remaining courts, Banerjee won the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Kang lost the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Basing won the tiebreaker on court #3, and is up 1-0 in the second set.
BC
BC
Looking very not good. Goodsick and Razeghi fell in straight sets at 5 and 6, respectively, and Stanford is down 3-0.
BC
Von Der Schulenburg won at #4, so it is now 1-3. On the remaining courts, Banerjee won the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Kang lost the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Basing won the tiebreaker on court #3, and is up 1-0 in the second set.
BC
(This post was last modified: 05-17-2025, 06:24 PM by BostonCard.)
Not looking good. We lost the doubles point, and are down a set in 2, 5, and 6. We won the first set at 1 and 4, and are in a tiebreaker at the 3s.
BC
Looking very not good. Goodsick and Razeghi fell in straight sets at 5 and 6, respectively, and Stanford is down 3-0.
BC
Von Der Schulenburg won at #4, so it is now 1-3. On the remaining courts, Banerjee won the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Kang lost the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Basing won the tiebreaker on court #3, and is up 1-0 in the second set.
BC
BC
Looking very not good. Goodsick and Razeghi fell in straight sets at 5 and 6, respectively, and Stanford is down 3-0.
BC
Von Der Schulenburg won at #4, so it is now 1-3. On the remaining courts, Banerjee won the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Kang lost the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Basing won the tiebreaker on court #3, and is up 1-0 in the second set.
BC
05-17-2025, 06:28 PM
BostonCard dateline='[url=tel:1747530442' Wrote: 1747530442[/url]']
Not looking good. We lost the doubles point, and are down a set in 2, 5, and 6. We won the first set at 1 and 4, and are in a tiebreaker at the 3s.
BC
Looking very not good. Goodsick and Razeghi fell in straight sets at 5 and 6, respectively, and Stanford is down 3-0.
BC
Von Der Schulenburg won at #4, so it is now 1-3. On the remaining courts, Banerjee won the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Kang lost the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Basing won the tiebreaker on court #3, and is up 1-0 in the second set.
BC
We’re in a tight spot.
BostonCard dateline='[url=tel:1747530442' Wrote: 1747530442[/url]']
Not looking good. We lost the doubles point, and are down a set in 2, 5, and 6. We won the first set at 1 and 4, and are in a tiebreaker at the 3s.
BC
Looking very not good. Goodsick and Razeghi fell in straight sets at 5 and 6, respectively, and Stanford is down 3-0.
BC
Von Der Schulenburg won at #4, so it is now 1-3. On the remaining courts, Banerjee won the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Kang lost the first set; the second set is tied at 5. Basing won the tiebreaker on court #3, and is up 1-0 in the second set.
BC
We’re in a tight spot.
We're still kicking. We have a chance to win 2 matches in 2 sets and the third is going to the third set.
Down 3-2...Kang and Banerjee playing a third set
****************
Looks like the end of the road... Trailing both third sets 2-5.
************
Still kicking. Both down 15-40, facing triple match point, and they win the game. Both still down 3-5. More breaks will be needed.
**********
Banerjee wins his next game, but Kang loses.
WF eliminates us 4-2
Down 3-2...Kang and Banerjee playing a third set
****************
Looks like the end of the road... Trailing both third sets 2-5.
************
Still kicking. Both down 15-40, facing triple match point, and they win the game. Both still down 3-5. More breaks will be needed.
**********
Banerjee wins his next game, but Kang loses.
WF eliminates us 4-2
We're still kicking. We have a chance to win 2 matches in 2 sets and the third is going to the third set.
Down 3-2...Kang and Banerjee playing a third set
****************
Looks like the end of the road... Trailing both third sets 2-5.
************
Still kicking. Both down 15-40, facing triple match point, and they win the game. Both still down 3-5. More breaks will be needed.
**********
Banerjee wins his next game, but Kang loses.
WF eliminates us 4-2
Down 3-2...Kang and Banerjee playing a third set
****************
Looks like the end of the road... Trailing both third sets 2-5.
************
Still kicking. Both down 15-40, facing triple match point, and they win the game. Both still down 3-5. More breaks will be needed.
**********
Banerjee wins his next game, but Kang loses.
WF eliminates us 4-2
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »