(05-11-2026, 02:35 PM)Papa John Wrote: In any case--if I'm reading the data correctly--UNC has a better ranking than Stanford in Offensive Efficiency, Draw Controls and Elo Rank (which has to do with player skill?). Stanford is ranked better in Defensive Efficiency and Save Percentage.
Having said that Stanford scored 9 and 8 goals in the previous two meetings, while UNC scored 18 and 12.
So my question for the experts: Besides somehow slowing down Chloe Humphrey, what will it take for Stanford to pull off a h.uge upset on Thursday?
No idea of whether it is somehow customized, but ELO is a pretty standard way of ranking that basically looks at head-to-head match-ups as they occur and updates the ranking based on how expected or surprising the result was. It was originally devised to rank chess players. Basically, ELO points will transfer from the losing team to the winning team, but the amount is based on how the result compares to the expected: if a weaker team pulls off an upset, they gain more ELO points than the favorite would have gained if they had won.
Here’s a description from Lacrosse reference:
https://lacrossereference.com/2017/04/25...-lacrosse/
BC
