Grim but this editorial gets at the new reality of major college sports (and probably some minor ones):
https://www.wsj.com/sports/basketball/mi..._permalink
Quote:And despite a reported $10 million roster, it wasn’t as easy as writing fat checks. Plenty of programs can pay. It’s talent identification, recruitment, plus figuring out how it fits together. It’s locating undervalued players that competitors don’t. It’s building a culture on the fly so the team plays like a team, and not a group of strangers who just met on the bus.
I’m not inclined to believe that this system will work for Stanford, even with further accommodations from admissions, a big donor ready to open their wallets and coaches willing to spend.
Paye will have to go, if not immediately almost surely after next season. If the allegations against her are even remotely accurate, she has sown the seeds of her own demise.
At the same time though, I don’t think bringing in a coach with a history in this program or some of the other ideas mentioned (eg Rouek) is going to do it. You need someone who is figuring out how to do “talent identification, recruitment, plus figuring out how it fits together.”
The first thing is to figure out if that’s what we want. It might be a bridge too far, in which case I think we’ll be looking at aspirations to mediocrity across football, men’s and women’s basketball, and firing Paye (though probably needed for other reasons) is not going to fix things.
If you a silver lining for a thought, remember that in the span of two years, both Michigan men’s basketball and Indiana football went from abject losers to national champions. So if Stanford institutionally decides to go all in on winning and executes it correctly, we are not in a situation where a three year Paye induced lull (or a 9 year lull in football of a two decades lull in men’s basketball) cause irreparable harm.
BC