10-03-2025, 02:55 PM
(10-03-2025, 01:42 PM)Mick Wrote:(10-03-2025, 12:42 PM)Leftcoast Wrote:(10-03-2025, 12:39 PM)TrumpCard Wrote: .. Here's the only explanation I see: The Warriors are willing to pay Kuminga a big windfall so that, under salary cap rules, the team can take back a bigger salary in the anticipated trade. Do you all agree with that?
Yup, salary caps create very weird economic logic.
I wonder if any of these would be doable:
Forwards / Wings
- Mikal Bridges — A prototypical two-way wing: good defense, reliable 3-point shooter, and can slot into multiple lineups. He is projected to be a free agent in 2026.
- Kristaps Porziņģis — A stretch forward option. If healthy, he provides size, spacing, and shooting. He is projected as a 2026 free agent.
Centers / Big Men
- Jusuf Nurkić — An established big who can rebound and provide post scoring. He is listed among 2026 UFA centers.
- Zach Collins — Offers mobility and shooting from the big spot; might be an interesting compromise center option.
(These are premium names — landing them would require serious financial commitment or trade assets.)
I strongly doubt the Knicks are looking to trade a guy they just emptied the cupboard to get. I suppose the others might be possible, depending on the circumstances. But may I ask why you are looking exclusively at 2026 FAs? Is there some salary cap reason that the Warriors wouldn't be able to take on a longer term contract? I was thinking Nic Claxton, for example. He doesn't bring the 3-pt shooting of some of the others, but he's a good/versatile defender.
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
