[Maple Leaf]

So beat PITT, KALSucks, and NCAR.  SIX wins

In two sentences, yes, that is the path.

Pitt, 5-2, is tough. Cal, also 5-2, is pretty good. We should beat North Carolina. With Brown at QB, our O will likely be predictable and modest at best. We should at least get to 4 wins.

Pitt beat Florida State by 3. They're traveling here, and Pitt hasn't traveled time zones (multiple) in many years. If it's an evening game, I think we beat them.

Pitt is a very good team, well at times it is a very good team and at other times they 'Coug-it' or should I say 'Pans-it' since their mascot is the Panther.  Anyhow at times they lose games they has no business in losing and at times beat teams that are superior to them.  Kind of reminds me of some of the Stanford teams of John Ralston and Jack Christiansen, that would upset a top 10 team and then lose to somebody who was ten worse, but at least those Stanford Teams were .500 or better as compared to what has been going on for the last 5-6 years.

[Maple Leaf]

So beat PITT, KALSucks, and NCAR.  SIX wins

In two sentences, yes, that is the path.

Pitt, 5-2, is tough. Cal, also 5-2, is pretty good. We should beat North Carolina. With Brown at QB, our O will likely be predictable and modest at best. We should at least get to 4 wins.

Pitt beat Florida State by 3. They're traveling here, and Pitt hasn't traveled time zones (multiple) in many years. If it's an evening game, I think we beat them.

Pitt is a very good team, well at times it is a very good team and at other times they 'Coug-it' or should I say 'Pans-it' since their mascot is the Panther.  Anyhow at times they lose games they has no business in losing and at times beat teams that are superior to them.  Kind of reminds me of some of the Stanford teams of John Ralston and Jack Christiansen, that would upset a top 10 team and then lose to somebody who was ten worse, but at least those Stanford Teams were .500 or better as compared to what has been going on for the last 5-6 years.