[82lsju]

Probable
- Yurosek
- Williams
- Sanders

Questionable
- A. Jones
- Filkins
- Miezen

Doubtful
- Manley

Out
- Bonner
- Smith
- Bragg

[82lsju]

Probable
- Yurosek
- Williams
- Sanders

Questionable
- A. Jones
- Filkins
- Miezen

Doubtful
- Manley

Out
- Bonner
- Smith
- Bragg

[JohnR34231]

Probable
- Yurosek
- Williams
- Sanders

Questionable
- A. Jones
- Filkins
- Miezen

Doubtful
- Manley

Out
- Bonner
- Smith
- Bragg

Miezen is hurt again? Oh well, at least he lasted four games this year instead of only one.

[JohnR34231]

Probable
- Yurosek
- Williams
- Sanders

Questionable
- A. Jones
- Filkins
- Miezen

Doubtful
- Manley

Out
- Bonner
- Smith
- Bragg

Miezen is hurt again? Oh well, at least he lasted four games this year instead of only one.

[Phogge]

And Bonner has spent most of his career in civies.

[Phogge]

And Bonner has spent most of his career in civies.

[82lsju]

the complete depth chart is here

https://gostanford.com/documents/2021/9/...Oregon.pdf

[82lsju]

the complete depth chart is here

https://gostanford.com/documents/2021/9/...Oregon.pdf

[Papa John]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

[Papa John]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

[82lsju]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Oregon depth chart

LB Justin Flowe still out (and reported elsewhere likely out the rest of the season)

https://gostanford.com/documents/2021/9/...anford.pdf

[82lsju]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Oregon depth chart

LB Justin Flowe still out (and reported elsewhere likely out the rest of the season)

https://gostanford.com/documents/2021/9/...anford.pdf

[donkey687]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Not sure about that. We lost Bragg and Miezan and pick up Yurosek, Williams and possibly two running backs.  If we do get Jones and Filkins back, that is probably a stronger lineup than last week, but losing Bragg is a big loss.

[donkey687]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Not sure about that. We lost Bragg and Miezan and pick up Yurosek, Williams and possibly two running backs.  If we do get Jones and Filkins back, that is probably a stronger lineup than last week, but losing Bragg is a big loss.

[Snorlax94]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Not sure about that. We lost Bragg and Miezan and pick up Yurosek, Williams and possibly two running backs.  If we do get Jones and Filkins back, that is probably a stronger lineup than last week, but losing Bragg is a big loss.

Although I agree losing Bragg and Miezan would be brobdingnagian, at least in those cases, we've had so many injuries in recent years that we have backups with a lot of game experience and who have even started.

I'd be more worried when we have to insert totally inexperienced true freshman (or upperclassman who never won a starting position and had no game experience). 

So from this perspective, I think we have a much stronger lineup for this week, but we're gonna need it.

[Snorlax94]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Not sure about that. We lost Bragg and Miezan and pick up Yurosek, Williams and possibly two running backs.  If we do get Jones and Filkins back, that is probably a stronger lineup than last week, but losing Bragg is a big loss.

Although I agree losing Bragg and Miezan would be brobdingnagian, at least in those cases, we've had so many injuries in recent years that we have backups with a lot of game experience and who have even started.

I'd be more worried when we have to insert totally inexperienced true freshman (or upperclassman who never won a starting position and had no game experience). 

So from this perspective, I think we have a much stronger lineup for this week, but we're gonna need it.

[martyup]

Ricky was the only LB that could stop the run.  We're toast.

[martyup]

Ricky was the only LB that could stop the run.  We're toast.

[Phogge]

Hornibrook has started a bunch of games. And it wasn't like Miezan played like Dick Butkus.

[Phogge]

Hornibrook has started a bunch of games. And it wasn't like Miezan played like Dick Butkus.

[martyup]

Hornibrook has started a bunch of games. And it wasn't like Miezan played like Dick Butkus.

Right, Miezan has been our best run stopping ILB.  And, that's why we have given up so many rushing yards.  No he isn't Butkus or Martinez, Skov, or Thomas.

[martyup]

Hornibrook has started a bunch of games. And it wasn't like Miezan played like Dick Butkus.

Right, Miezan has been our best run stopping ILB.  And, that's why we have given up so many rushing yards.  No he isn't Butkus or Martinez, Skov, or Thomas.

[old spanish trail]

Hornibrook has started a bunch of games. And it wasn't like Miezan played like Dick Butkus.

I thought when Hornibrook went into the game last year, he was the best of the bunch at OG

[old spanish trail]

Hornibrook has started a bunch of games. And it wasn't like Miezan played like Dick Butkus.

I thought when Hornibrook went into the game last year, he was the best of the bunch at OG

[Papa John]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Not sure about that. We lost Bragg and Miezan and pick up Yurosek, Williams and possibly two running backs.  If we do get Jones and Filkins back, that is probably a stronger lineup than last week, but losing Bragg is a big loss.

I was looking exclusively at these week's depth chart. As everyone knows, last week Jones, Filkins and Williams were nowhere to be found on the depth chart. Bragg's absence is notable, but Hornibrook has experience and the systemic issues with the offensive line are a much bigger problem than trading Hornibrook for Bragg, IMO.

Miezan is listed on this week's depth chart, so I don't think it's 100% certain that he won't be able to play. At least not as of Tuesday morning.

[Papa John]

Well, the depth chart looks better than last week. We need all the help that we can get versus the Ducks.

Thibodeaux is back for Oregon.

Not sure about that. We lost Bragg and Miezan and pick up Yurosek, Williams and possibly two running backs.  If we do get Jones and Filkins back, that is probably a stronger lineup than last week, but losing Bragg is a big loss.

I was looking exclusively at these week's depth chart. As everyone knows, last week Jones, Filkins and Williams were nowhere to be found on the depth chart. Bragg's absence is notable, but Hornibrook has experience and the systemic issues with the offensive line are a much bigger problem than trading Hornibrook for Bragg, IMO.

Miezan is listed on this week's depth chart, so I don't think it's 100% certain that he won't be able to play. At least not as of Tuesday morning.

[SamuelMcF]

We aren't stopping the run with or without Miezan.

[SamuelMcF]

We aren't stopping the run with or without Miezan.

[CardinalSagehen]

This Oregon beat reporter says Jones, Filkins, and Miezan are all IN.  The timing of the tweet does roughly correspond to Shaw’s plan to know their availability after today’s practice. This wasn’t reported anywhere else, but it seems fairly credible.  

[tweet]https://twitter.com/jamescrepea/status/1443731226288787457?s=21[/tweet]

[CardinalSagehen]

This Oregon beat reporter says Jones, Filkins, and Miezan are all IN.  The timing of the tweet does roughly correspond to Shaw’s plan to know their availability after today’s practice. This wasn’t reported anywhere else, but it seems fairly credible.  

[tweet]https://twitter.com/jamescrepea/status/1443731226288787457?s=21[/tweet]

[PVTree]

As Elmer would say, "It's Duck season!"

[PVTree]

As Elmer would say, "It's Duck season!"

[82lsju]

As Elmer would say, "It's Duck season!"

[82lsju]

As Elmer would say, "It's Duck season!"

[murky]

As Elmer would say, "It's Duck season!"

Do players listed as "questionable" ever play?

[murky]

As Elmer would say, "It's Duck season!"

Do players listed as "questionable" ever play?

[CardinalSagehen]

Do players listed as "questionable" ever play?

I take your point.  Shaw has often been overly optimistic, perhaps strategically. But in this case, it seems like they’re playing.  Here’s the full text of his interview from last night.

[CardinalSagehen]

Do players listed as "questionable" ever play?

I take your point.  Shaw has often been overly optimistic, perhaps strategically. But in this case, it seems like they’re playing.  Here’s the full text of his interview from last night.

[murky]

Do players listed as "questionable" ever play?

I take your point.  Shaw has often been overly optimistic, perhaps strategically. But in this case, it seems like they’re playing.  Here’s the full text of his interview from last night.

That's encouraging.

[murky]

Do players listed as "questionable" ever play?

I take your point.  Shaw has often been overly optimistic, perhaps strategically. But in this case, it seems like they’re playing.  Here’s the full text of his interview from last night.

That's encouraging.