(04-13-2022, 09:57 AM)KDIES Wrote: On ESPN they rated all the teams and each individual draftee. They gave Indiana a C for picking Lexie when they did and figured she should have gone later in the draft. They said Lexus was a good outside shooter and was a good defensive player but they questioned her athleticism. I guess who ever rated her never saw her play. What a bunch of BS.
Lexi is the same height as Engstler and I would say a better athlete. Maybe they could have gotten her at 10 or later, but she will make it. The WNBA Draft is evolving. It was great to see some movement on picks prior to and even during the draft. They might have been able to snag her later, but I think by drafting her at 6 it shows how highly the regard her and they didn't want to mess around and roll the dice on her being available.
Slightly random thought, why do they not make the roster size 15 like the NBA? I know finances are always an issue with the WNBA, but I think they should invest in those 3 extra roster spots before they even address issues like mode of travel, charter flights vs. commercial, etc. You want to grow the sport, the first place to do it is to make it more attainable. You could have max salaries on those last 3 designated spots to make it more fiscally viable. If the teams are being subsidized by their owners in most markets anyway I think it would be money well spent on growing the game overall.