[M T]

O Boards will be a problem with playing mostly 5 out.  Of course the coaches are well aware they will adjust. 
Hope Somfai sees this and says “ hmm I can play post”

The number of O boards are always a problem when you're hitting 50+%.   Shoot 33.3% (So. Carolina) and there should be more O-boards.
One should always look at the percentage of opportunities.

Le Moyne had 8 OR, 24 DR.   Stanford had 9 OR, 36 DR.  
Stanford got 9/33 = 27.3% of the possible OR, and 36/44 = 81.8% of the possible DR.
(Unfortunately, those numbers include FT rebounds, which are clearly stacked against the offense.)
It is not a sensible measure, but I add the two percentages, giving 109.1%.
That's a strong percentage, but not totally dominating.

For comparison, So. Car. had 22/54 OR (40.7% impressive), 30/50 DR (60%, poor).   Combined, 100.7%.
In comparison  to the Stanford game, So.Car. -  Michigan  shooting was poor, resulting in about 25% more misses.

[M T]

O Boards will be a problem with playing mostly 5 out.  Of course the coaches are well aware they will adjust. 
Hope Somfai sees this and says “ hmm I can play post”

The number of O boards are always a problem when you're hitting 50+%.   Shoot 33.3% (So. Carolina) and there should be more O-boards.
One should always look at the percentage of opportunities.

Le Moyne had 8 OR, 24 DR.   Stanford had 9 OR, 36 DR.  
Stanford got 9/33 = 27.3% of the possible OR, and 36/44 = 81.8% of the possible DR.
(Unfortunately, those numbers include FT rebounds, which are clearly stacked against the offense.)
It is not a sensible measure, but I add the two percentages, giving 109.1%.
That's a strong percentage, but not totally dominating.

For comparison, So. Car. had 22/54 OR (40.7% impressive), 30/50 DR (60%, poor).   Combined, 100.7%.
In comparison  to the Stanford game, So.Car. -  Michigan  shooting was poor, resulting in about 25% more misses.