[Card10Fan]

The final line: 1/16, 0/9 from 3, yet still 14 points after going 12/14 from the line.  And no, had he gone 5/16, 3/9, we would have been 1 point short (and probably more, since we might not have gotten quite as many offensive boards).

BC

Stanford led 16-9 on offense boards yet Cal has more second chance points. Our O-boards did not lead to much offense. 

I choose to believe if Okorie would have hit a 3 or back to back buckets during the middle stretch of the 2nd half when the game was tied, Maples would have exploded. Energy and momentum would have been on Stanford’s side. Oh well. Still sucks losing to Cal.

[Card10Fan]

The final line: 1/16, 0/9 from 3, yet still 14 points after going 12/14 from the line.  And no, had he gone 5/16, 3/9, we would have been 1 point short (and probably more, since we might not have gotten quite as many offensive boards).

BC

Stanford led 16-9 on offense boards yet Cal has more second chance points. Our O-boards did not lead to much offense. 

I choose to believe if Okorie would have hit a 3 or back to back buckets during the middle stretch of the 2nd half when the game was tied, Maples would have exploded. Energy and momentum would have been on Stanford’s side. Oh well. Still sucks losing to Cal.