(01-09-2020, 07:26 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Kapler was in charge of the Dodgers’ farm system which gave him a role developing younger players. Usually managers are better in their second gig. Kapler checks both boxes the Giants covet, someone who has experience developing players, and one who has had managing experience.
Any comparison of Kapler to David Shaw is intellectually lazy and/or dishonest. David Shaw is responsible for everything in Stanford Football, including who is brought in the program, how they are developed, and coached. Kapler has no say in who is on the roster and he’s also being told where and how to play everyone. His job is to take the information he is given and translate it to the players, be it how to work on their specific skills or how to use them in games. (Heck, I haven’t even mentioned his taking two trips to the mound without having a pitcher warming up. I knew not to do that when I was 5 years old.).
Shaw and Kapler have completely different jobs, but go ahead and make off point, unrelated arguments that demonstrate emotional defensiveness more than clear-headed and credible assessments based on reality. Seriously, why the need to bring David Shaw into a discussion about baseball and the Giants?
As for “ clear headed and credible assessments based on reality” i’ve laid out several times why I believe Kaplan was a bad hire. Based on his poor record at Philly, his reputation of not being able to control the clubhouse (liked but not respected is a bad combo for a manager) and issues that I think will hurt him with the Fanbase. My point outsider, which you keep missing, is it was a bad hire because it was a poor decision from a risk management analysis. He did not need to hire Kapler and take on the baggage. Particularly when he knows, I’m relatively confident, that these are going to be very lean years. And the one that usually takes the brunt of the criticism in lean years, justified or not, is the manager.
As for the limited role for today’s manager - essentially puppets with an IPad- I have made that point as well. Which also supports my position that he’s a bad hire. Essentially everyone Farhan was interviewing fit that mode. Analytics uber alles. All of them.
As for why, Shaw - because this is a Stanford board. And I thought given what was, imo, your ludicrous statement, that using the over the top criticism of Shaw on this board (which pales in comparison to another board I frequent)) was appropriate to support my conclusion that it’s always the head guy that gets the blame.
BTW - if I’m wrong, I’ll be the first to admit it. Hope I am. I want him to succeed. I’m a Giants fan, after all.