[cardcrimson]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

[cardcrimson]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

[82lsju]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

[82lsju]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

[MV72018]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

So he worked at the Daily and KZSU as an undergrad, founded a company that contended that there's a shortfall of "beneficial software products in sports," worked at Oracle, allegedly "mentored startup founders and young executives" on "leadership and strategy," and will "build a front office" for the football program (whatever that means). So far I fail to see that, given his background, this hire is going to do anything substantive to promote Stanford football's renaissance. Can any of you help me see the positive value added by this position and hire?

[MV72018]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

So he worked at the Daily and KZSU as an undergrad, founded a company that contended that there's a shortfall of "beneficial software products in sports," worked at Oracle, allegedly "mentored startup founders and young executives" on "leadership and strategy," and will "build a front office" for the football program (whatever that means). So far I fail to see that, given his background, this hire is going to do anything substantive to promote Stanford football's renaissance. Can any of you help me see the positive value added by this position and hire?

[SamuelMcF]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

So he worked at the Daily and KZSU as an undergrad, founded a company that contended that there's a shortfall of "beneficial software products in sports," worked at Oracle, allegedly "mentored startup founders and young executives" on "leadership and strategy," and will "build a front office" for the football program (whatever that means). So far I fail to see that, given his background, this hire is going to do anything substantive to promote Stanford football's renaissance. Can any of you help me see the positive value added by this position and hire?

Co-wrote this book https://www.amazon.com/Rags-Roses-Rise-S...0989655008

Didn't just "work at the Daily," he was the managing editor for sports. Didn't just "work at KZSU," he called football games.

Super into analytics and wants to use them to "Moneyball" the roster.

Quote from paid forum: "If I could've picked a single person who lived and breathed Stanford football (and subsequently Stanford sports), it was him."



[Yes, I'm aware of the similarities with my username - it's not me!]

[SamuelMcF]

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

So he worked at the Daily and KZSU as an undergrad, founded a company that contended that there's a shortfall of "beneficial software products in sports," worked at Oracle, allegedly "mentored startup founders and young executives" on "leadership and strategy," and will "build a front office" for the football program (whatever that means). So far I fail to see that, given his background, this hire is going to do anything substantive to promote Stanford football's renaissance. Can any of you help me see the positive value added by this position and hire?

Co-wrote this book https://www.amazon.com/Rags-Roses-Rise-S...0989655008

Didn't just "work at the Daily," he was the managing editor for sports. Didn't just "work at KZSU," he called football games.

Super into analytics and wants to use them to "Moneyball" the roster.

Quote from paid forum: "If I could've picked a single person who lived and breathed Stanford football (and subsequently Stanford sports), it was him."



[Yes, I'm aware of the similarities with my username - it's not me!]

[82lsju]

what his LinkedIn profile says about his new role

Assistant General Manager
Stanford Football · Jan 2025 - Present

• - Work closely with GM on all aspects of his role as his top deputy and trusted advisor

• - Take the lead on setting strategy for the GM office and prioritizing all of the work streams we take on

• - Build out the data infrastructure for the GM’s office to put real values on high-school and college players to build the most efficient roster

• - Spearhead initiatives within Stanford, notably the academic departments and all things student life & residential education

• - Stand in for and represent the GM at various engagements and meetings

https://www.linkedin.com/in/samfisher908/

what his "about" says 

About

I'm the Founder / CEO of a new venture related to NIL in College Sports. It's an exciting and rapidly changing time in this new space, and we're excited to make our mark on it. We believe that college athletes should be paid, and we're working on ways to make it easier and more fun. Stay tuned...

I'm also an executive coach focusing on startup founders, young executives, athletes, and solopreneurs. I helping clients create better work-life balance at the stage in their career where they transition from individual contributor to manager or organization leader. I bring experience from three years working at various tech start-ups (including my own sports software venture), an MBA at Stanford GSB, and three years in product at Oracle Cloud.

the stealth startup appears to have ended in Jan 2025

[82lsju]

what his LinkedIn profile says about his new role

Assistant General Manager
Stanford Football · Jan 2025 - Present

• - Work closely with GM on all aspects of his role as his top deputy and trusted advisor

• - Take the lead on setting strategy for the GM office and prioritizing all of the work streams we take on

• - Build out the data infrastructure for the GM’s office to put real values on high-school and college players to build the most efficient roster

• - Spearhead initiatives within Stanford, notably the academic departments and all things student life & residential education

• - Stand in for and represent the GM at various engagements and meetings

https://www.linkedin.com/in/samfisher908/

what his "about" says 

About

I'm the Founder / CEO of a new venture related to NIL in College Sports. It's an exciting and rapidly changing time in this new space, and we're excited to make our mark on it. We believe that college athletes should be paid, and we're working on ways to make it easier and more fun. Stay tuned...

I'm also an executive coach focusing on startup founders, young executives, athletes, and solopreneurs. I helping clients create better work-life balance at the stage in their career where they transition from individual contributor to manager or organization leader. I bring experience from three years working at various tech start-ups (including my own sports software venture), an MBA at Stanford GSB, and three years in product at Oracle Cloud.

the stealth startup appears to have ended in Jan 2025

[needle]

Interesting first hire by AL. I suspect we'll get to read a book about this, one way or another.

[needle]

Interesting first hire by AL. I suspect we'll get to read a book about this, one way or another.

[BostonCard]

Quote from paid forum: "If I could've picked a single person who lived and breathed Stanford football (and subsequently Stanford sports), it was him."

Enthusiasm is necessary but not sufficient for the job, and over-enthusiasm can sometimes be a barrier for effectiveness.

BC

[BostonCard]

Quote from paid forum: "If I could've picked a single person who lived and breathed Stanford football (and subsequently Stanford sports), it was him."

Enthusiasm is necessary but not sufficient for the job, and over-enthusiasm can sometimes be a barrier for effectiveness.

BC

[midnight21]

Sam was my editor when I first started covering sports at The Daily. He was the human embodiment of EUTM when it came to Stanford sports (not just football). But what made him impactful, and what I remember most about him, was a genuine curiosity. 

He was curious about other people, which allowed him to connect not only with the like-minded folks in the newsroom, but also with the athletes across the various Stanford teams he covered. I was always impressed by the ease with which he could move from interaction to interaction.

He was also thoughtful and creative about the ways in which The Daily could improve its coverage, and empowered staff to contribute ideas and take ownership of developing these projects. In my biased opinion, the Daily sports section experienced something of a golden era during and immediately after his time there, and he absolutely deserves some credit for that. More than a couple future professional sports journalists developed during Sam's era.

I haven't kept in touch with him post graduation, but it seems his professional path has followed a trajectory of using his curiosity and thoughtfulness to make products and people better. If he can translate those attributes to this role -- and from the job description on his Linkedin, it seems like he will have some latitude to do so -- I have real confidence that he can be successful.

We don't really know what this job will entail yet, but if you're looking for someone with a deep and personal understanding of the history and culture of Stanford football and what has made it successful in the past, combined with very relevant experience in the NIL space, Sam's your guy.

[midnight21]

Sam was my editor when I first started covering sports at The Daily. He was the human embodiment of EUTM when it came to Stanford sports (not just football). But what made him impactful, and what I remember most about him, was a genuine curiosity. 

He was curious about other people, which allowed him to connect not only with the like-minded folks in the newsroom, but also with the athletes across the various Stanford teams he covered. I was always impressed by the ease with which he could move from interaction to interaction.

He was also thoughtful and creative about the ways in which The Daily could improve its coverage, and empowered staff to contribute ideas and take ownership of developing these projects. In my biased opinion, the Daily sports section experienced something of a golden era during and immediately after his time there, and he absolutely deserves some credit for that. More than a couple future professional sports journalists developed during Sam's era.

I haven't kept in touch with him post graduation, but it seems his professional path has followed a trajectory of using his curiosity and thoughtfulness to make products and people better. If he can translate those attributes to this role -- and from the job description on his Linkedin, it seems like he will have some latitude to do so -- I have real confidence that he can be successful.

We don't really know what this job will entail yet, but if you're looking for someone with a deep and personal understanding of the history and culture of Stanford football and what has made it successful in the past, combined with very relevant experience in the NIL space, Sam's your guy.

[MV72018]

Sam was my editor when I first started covering sports at The Daily. He was the human embodiment of EUTM when it came to Stanford sports (not just football). But what made him impactful, and what I remember most about him, was a genuine curiosity. 

He was curious about other people, which allowed him to connect not only with the like-minded folks in the newsroom, but also with the athletes across the various Stanford teams he covered. I was always impressed by the ease with which he could move from interaction to interaction.

He was also thoughtful and creative about the ways in which The Daily could improve its coverage, and empowered staff to contribute ideas and take ownership of developing these projects. In my biased opinion, the Daily sports section experienced something of a golden era during and immediately after his time there, and he absolutely deserves some credit for that. More than a couple future professional sports journalists developed during Sam's era.

I haven't kept in touch with him post graduation, but it seems his professional path has followed a trajectory of using his curiosity and thoughtfulness to make products and people better. If he can translate those attributes to this role -- and from the job description on his Linkedin, it seems like he will have some latitude to do so -- I have real confidence that he can be successful.

We don't really know what this job will entail yet, but if you're looking for someone with a deep and personal understanding of the history and culture of Stanford football and what has made it successful in the past, combined with very relevant experience in the NIL space, Sam's your guy.

Thank you for your thoughtful and persuasive reply.

---

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

So he worked at the Daily and KZSU as an undergrad, founded a company that contended that there's a shortfall of "beneficial software products in sports," worked at Oracle, allegedly "mentored startup founders and young executives" on "leadership and strategy," and will "build a front office" for the football program (whatever that means). So far I fail to see that, given his background, this hire is going to do anything substantive to promote Stanford football's renaissance. Can any of you help me see the positive value added by this position and hire?

Co-wrote this book https://www.amazon.com/Rags-Roses-Rise-S...0989655008

Didn't just "work at the Daily," he was the managing editor for sports. Didn't just "work at KZSU," he called football games.

Super into analytics and wants to use them to "Moneyball" the roster.

Quote from paid forum: "If I could've picked a single person who lived and breathed Stanford football (and subsequently Stanford sports), it was him."



[Yes, I'm aware of the similarities with my username - it's not me!]

Thank you for your reply.

[MV72018]

Sam was my editor when I first started covering sports at The Daily. He was the human embodiment of EUTM when it came to Stanford sports (not just football). But what made him impactful, and what I remember most about him, was a genuine curiosity. 

He was curious about other people, which allowed him to connect not only with the like-minded folks in the newsroom, but also with the athletes across the various Stanford teams he covered. I was always impressed by the ease with which he could move from interaction to interaction.

He was also thoughtful and creative about the ways in which The Daily could improve its coverage, and empowered staff to contribute ideas and take ownership of developing these projects. In my biased opinion, the Daily sports section experienced something of a golden era during and immediately after his time there, and he absolutely deserves some credit for that. More than a couple future professional sports journalists developed during Sam's era.

I haven't kept in touch with him post graduation, but it seems his professional path has followed a trajectory of using his curiosity and thoughtfulness to make products and people better. If he can translate those attributes to this role -- and from the job description on his Linkedin, it seems like he will have some latitude to do so -- I have real confidence that he can be successful.

We don't really know what this job will entail yet, but if you're looking for someone with a deep and personal understanding of the history and culture of Stanford football and what has made it successful in the past, combined with very relevant experience in the NIL space, Sam's your guy.

Thank you for your thoughtful and persuasive reply.

---

Sam Fisher:

https://x.com/samfisher908/status/187644..._&ref_url=

And to quote Meg Ryan, "And hearts are breaking all over the world tonight. . . "

what The Daily has to say...

https://stanforddaily.com/2025/01/07/sta...an-07-2025

So he worked at the Daily and KZSU as an undergrad, founded a company that contended that there's a shortfall of "beneficial software products in sports," worked at Oracle, allegedly "mentored startup founders and young executives" on "leadership and strategy," and will "build a front office" for the football program (whatever that means). So far I fail to see that, given his background, this hire is going to do anything substantive to promote Stanford football's renaissance. Can any of you help me see the positive value added by this position and hire?

Co-wrote this book https://www.amazon.com/Rags-Roses-Rise-S...0989655008

Didn't just "work at the Daily," he was the managing editor for sports. Didn't just "work at KZSU," he called football games.

Super into analytics and wants to use them to "Moneyball" the roster.

Quote from paid forum: "If I could've picked a single person who lived and breathed Stanford football (and subsequently Stanford sports), it was him."



[Yes, I'm aware of the similarities with my username - it's not me!]

Thank you for your reply.

[martyup]

Many on this board have been for some time lamenting how far behind Stanford has been in the NIL arms race.  Well, it seems that this hire by AL will hit that problem on the head.  I'm excited.

[martyup]

Many on this board have been for some time lamenting how far behind Stanford has been in the NIL arms race.  Well, it seems that this hire by AL will hit that problem on the head.  I'm excited.

[Mick]

Many on this board have been for some time lamenting how far behind Stanford has been in the NIL arms race.  Well, it seems that this hire by AL will hit that problem on the head.  I'm excited.

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

[Mick]

Many on this board have been for some time lamenting how far behind Stanford has been in the NIL arms race.  Well, it seems that this hire by AL will hit that problem on the head.  I'm excited.

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

[george]

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

I'm squarely in "Jesse Spano" excited

[george]

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

I'm squarely in "Jesse Spano" excited

[martyup]

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

I'm squarely in "Jesse Spano" excited

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

[martyup]

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

I'm squarely in "Jesse Spano" excited

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

[Mick]

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

I'm squarely in "Jesse Spano" excited

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

6-6. You heard it here first.

Mick predicts 6-6 with an LA Bowl win in 2025

[Mick]

Well, I don't know if I'm "Pointer Sisters" excited. But I am excited...

I'm squarely in "Jesse Spano" excited

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

6-6. You heard it here first.

Mick predicts 6-6 with an LA Bowl win in 2025

[Hulk01]

Impressed with Sam from the beginning.  Bright, curious, energetic,  with a special insight into football.

A terrific hire, I think.

[Hulk01]

Impressed with Sam from the beginning.  Bright, curious, energetic,  with a special insight into football.

A terrific hire, I think.

[george]

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

I mean, you don't have to have been a Stanford fan for too long to remember when we did do worse than 3-9.  I am excited about changes, and I'm a big believer in people who are passionate about Stanford.  But as bad as things are, they can definitely get worse.

[george]

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

I mean, you don't have to have been a Stanford fan for too long to remember when we did do worse than 3-9.  I am excited about changes, and I'm a big believer in people who are passionate about Stanford.  But as bad as things are, they can definitely get worse.

[Jamesy]

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

I mean, you don't have to have been a Stanford fan for too long to remember when we did do worse than 3-9.  I am excited about changes, and I'm a big believer in people who are passionate about Stanford.  But as bad as things are, they can definitely get worse.

I know most of us far exceed the bar for duration of fandom, but Stanford hasn't been worse than 3-9 since before some current Stanford students were even born. I do think I feel worse right now than I did after that 2006 season because we swiftly fired Harris after just one bad season (we were a missed INT call vs UC Davis away from making a bowl in 2005) whereas I have lost all hope at a turnaround next season with Taylor still as HC.

[Jamesy]

Scared we might do worse than 3-9?  We really don't have much to lose, do we?

I mean, you don't have to have been a Stanford fan for too long to remember when we did do worse than 3-9.  I am excited about changes, and I'm a big believer in people who are passionate about Stanford.  But as bad as things are, they can definitely get worse.

I know most of us far exceed the bar for duration of fandom, but Stanford hasn't been worse than 3-9 since before some current Stanford students were even born. I do think I feel worse right now than I did after that 2006 season because we swiftly fired Harris after just one bad season (we were a missed INT call vs UC Davis away from making a bowl in 2005) whereas I have lost all hope at a turnaround next season with Taylor still as HC.